Prolegomena to a Study of the Economics of Roman Art

Dados Bibliográficos

ID5115201
AutoresWilliam V Harris (Columbia University, autor correspondente)
Ano2015
Volume119
Fascículo3
Páginas395-417
Data de publicação2015-07-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoAmerican Journal of Archaeology (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0002-9114 • E-ISSN: 1939-828X
EditoraUniversity of Chicago Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.3764/aja.119.3.0395
OpenAlexW2401570644
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas9
Referências citadas33

This article proposes a series of fundamental questions concerning the economic aspects of the production of works of art in the Roman world, focusing chiefly on “high-end” production. The first and last of the five questions addressed serve as a chronological framework: (1) When did war booty and extortion cease to be important sources of the supply of works of art and give way to “normal” markets? (2) In what sense did clients provide artists with patronage? (3) What were the market mechanisms for meeting the demand for works by well-known artists, and what were the effects of the demand for works by famous artists of the past? (4) Was there an integrated empire-wide market in works of art or in the more or less precious materials that artists used? (5) When the Roman economy began its slow fragmentation and disintegration in the third century—a process that was still going on 400 years later—what were the effects on the production and distribution of works of art? Answering these questions with the normal methods of economic history helps show where some of the biggest challenges are for historians of Roman art

Archaeology · Art · Art market · Economics · Economy · Extortion · Production (economics) · Roman Empire · Supply and demand · Visual arts · Art History and Market Analysis · Classical Antiquity Studies · Classics · Historical and Literary Studies · History