Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Secessionist Self-Determination

Some Lessons from Katanga, Biafra and Bangladesh

Dados Bibliográficos

ID5147693
AutoresM Rafiqul Islam (0000-0001-8771-8661, University of Rajshahi, autor correspondente)
Ano1985
Volume22
Fascículo3
Páginas211-221
Data de publicação1985-09-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoJournal of Peace Research (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0022-3433 • E-ISSN: 1460-3578
EditoraSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/002234338502200303
OpenAlexW2042397130
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas9
Referências citadas19

The existing world order is frequently interrupted by secessionist claims. The present state-oriented solidarity for 'territorial integrity under all circumstances at any cost' has not succeeded in solving the problem. It has now become imperative for the international community to formulate principles and guidelines to cope with this problem. This paper examines three of the major separatist attempts since the Second World War and the way the rest of the world community reacted to them. The failure of Katanga and Biafra secessions and the success of the Bangladesh one were not isolated incidents. Rather these are probably normative for future claims in the sense that some lessons worthy of imitation may be derived from these experiences. Whilst the right to secession was denied in case of Katanga and Biafra, the Bangladesh situation indicates that the world community is willing to recognise a limited and orderly right to secession as the ultimate remedy under certain circumstances, particularly in extreme cases of the abuse and misuse of territorial integrity. Several factors distinguish the Bangladesh situation from the other two cases. In addition to a comparative study of these factors the paper develops certain common and influential criteria which the world community may increasingly recognise in responding to a future secessionist claim. This would in turn assist the international community in its concern for the establishment of a legal order to deal with post-colonial self-determination claims

Business · International community · Normative · Order (exchange) · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Secession · Sociology · Solidarity · Sovereignty · State (computer science) · Territorial integrity · Computer Science · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics · International Law and Human Rights · Law

  • Taiwan's Future National Identity

    Robert M Marsh•International Journal of…•2000

  • State Formation Under International Supervision and the Construction of Hierarchies in National Membership

    Maja Spanu•Ethnopolitics•2019

  • Power and Recognition

    Open Access•Martin Riegl, B Dobos•Politics & Policy•2018

  • Secession, legitimacy and the use of child soldiers

    Open Access•Trace Lasley, Clayton L Thyne•Conflict Management and Peace…•2014

  • What drives support for separatism? Exposure to conflict and relative ethnic size in Biafra, Nigeria

    Open Access•Jacob S Lewis•Nations and Nationalism•2023

  • We the peoples? The strange demise of self-determination

    Open Access•Uriel Abulof•European Journal of International…•2016

  • Mercenaries in the Congo and Biafra, 1960-1970

    Stephen Rooke, Stephen Rookes et al.•Small Wars and Insurgencies•2022

  • The Horn of Africa in the shadow of the cold war

    Khalid Mustafa Medani•The Journal of North African…•2012

  • Ethnic Identification and Nationalist Movements

    Saad Nagi, Saad S Nagi•Human Organization•1992

  • Pakistan Post‐mortem and the Roots of Bangladesh

    Open Access•W H MORRIS‐JONES•The Political Quarterly•1972

  • Secession and the Right of Self-Determination

    Open Access•Onyeonoro S Kamanu•The Journal of Modern African…•1974

  • The Crisis of Nationhood in Nigeria

    Open Access•Parbati K Sircar•International Studies•1968

  • The Domestic Jurisdiction of States in the Practice of the United Nations and Regional Organisations

    Open Access•Antônio Augusto Cançado Trindade•International and Comparative Law…•1976

  • Was “Biafra” at Any Time A State in International Law

    Open Access•David Adedayo Ijalaye•American Journal of International…•1971

  • Self–Determination in International Law

    Open Access•Ved P Nanda•American Journal of International…•1972

  • Self-Determination” and the Palestinians

    Open Access•M Cherif Bassiouni•American Journal of International…•1971

  • Treaties and Changed Circumstances ( Rebus Sic Stantibus )

    Open Access•Oliver J Lissitzyn•American Journal of International…•1967

  • Self-Determination

    Open Access•Charles R Nixon•World Politics•1972

  • Self-Determination

    Open Access•Walker Connor•World Politics•1967

  • The Breakdown of Pakistan's Political System

    Open Access•Khalid B Sayeed•International Journal Canada s…•1972

  • Secession. The Legitimacy of Self-Determination

    Open Access•Lee C Buchheit•Verfassung in Recht und Übersee•1981

  • Modernisation and Political Disintegration

    Open Access•Paul Anber•The Journal of Modern African…•1967

  • The Right to Self-Determination

    K Panter-Brick, S K Panter-Brick•International Affairs•1968

  • The Last Days of United Pakistan

    G W Choudhury•International Affairs•1973

  • Is There a Case for Biafra

    K W J Post, KY Post•International Affairs•1968

  • Intra-State Imperialism

    Open Access•K P Misra•Journal of Peace Research•1972

  • The Limits of Self-Determination

    Open Access•René Lemarchand•American Political Science Review•1962

Obras citantes distintas9
Citações por ano0,26
Intervalo de citações1992 - 2023 (32)
Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 8
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae