Conditional Cash Transfer Programmes in Brazil, Argentina and Scotland
A comparative analysis of their conceptions
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 5334412 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Jeni Vaitsman (0000-0001-8569-853X, Universidade Federal Fluminense), Giovanna Bueno Cinacchi (0000-0002-2171-5772, Instituto Rede Abrigo (Irab), Brasil), Lucia Lobato (0000-0002-2646-9523, Universidade Federal Fluminense), Lenaura Vasconcelos Lobato (0000-0003-2161-7133, Universidade Federal Fluminense), Stephanie De Azevedo Barreto (0000-0002-1790-2057, Secretaria de Estado de Desenvolvimento Social e Direitos Humanos (SEDSODH), Brasil), María Ximena Simpson (0000-0003-0801-8304, National University of General San Martín) |
| Ano | 2025 |
| Volume | 49 |
| Fascículo | 145 |
| Data de publicação | 2025-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Saúde em Debate (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0103-1104 • E-ISSN: 2358-2898 |
| Editora | FapUNIFESP (SciELO) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1590/2358-289820251459978i |
| OpenAlex | W4411494312 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referências citadas | 17 |
This article compares three Conditional Cash Transfer Programmes (CCTPs), the Bolsa Família, the Asignación Universal por Hijo and the Universal Credit in, respectively, Brazil, Argentina, and Scotland from the standpoint of their conceptions and meanings. The objectives, conceptions and arguments that guide beneficiary selection and conditionalities are analysed and compared using the policy analysis methodology and focusing on the political and ideological contexts in which these policies were formulated. In the three countries, CCTPs have become the primary strategy for combating poverty in contexts of fiscal austerity. In Argentina and Brazil, with their historical deficits in access to social rights, the programmes have reduced the worst rates of income poverty and expanded social inclusion through health and education conditionalities, constituting a move to combat inequalities without changing the structural conditions that sustain them. In Scotland, Universal Credit broke with the universalist conception of welfare, of meeting people's basic needs. By retracting social assistance and applying a punitive logic designed to produce behavioural changes among the poorest, it had adverse effects, especially on the most vulnerable in the population
Austerity · Beneficiary · Cash · Cash transfers · Conditional cash transfer · Development economics · Economic growth · Economics · Political science · Politics · Population · Poverty · Social protection · Sociology · Employment and Welfare Studies · Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism · Social Policy and Reform Studies
The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning
Effects on mental health of a UK welfare reform, Universal Credit
Agendas, alternatives, and public policies
Desenvolvimento como liberdade e o rompimento do ciclo criminoso
The New Politics of the Welfare State
Social Policy in a Development Context
Good Fences Make Good Neighbours
The Quiet Paradigm Revolution of Social Investment
Poverty
The asset vulnerability framework
Sistemas de saúde, mecanismos de governança e porosidade governamental em perspectiva comparada
Individualização da incerteza
Comparative-Historical Methodology
From social security to state-sanctioned insecurity
Challenges to the Strategic State
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |