Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Will One More Dollar Help? The Effect of Sequential Incentives on Survey Participation and Costs in a Concurrent Mixed-mode Survey

Dados Bibliográficos

ID5577656
AutoresK Olson (0000-0002-8004-0226, University of Nebraska–Lincoln, autor correspondente), Amanda Ganshert (0009-0007-8458-0653, University of Nebraska–Lincoln), Mia Bourek (University of Nebraska–Lincoln)
Ano2025
Volume38
Fascículo2
Páginas95-114
Data de publicação2025-10-17
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoCAM (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1087-8513 • E-ISSN: 1552-3969
EditoraSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/1525822x251348086
OpenAlexW4415300668
IdiomaEN
Referências citadas12

Prepaid monetary incentives increase response rates in surveys. Whether offering a second monetary incentive to nonrespondents in web-and-mail surveys increases response rates and improves sample composition is relatively unexplored. This article examines an experiment in a general population probability survey in which nonrespondents were randomly assigned to receive $0, $1, $2, or $5 in a later mailing after receiving an initial $1 in the first mailing. Response rates increased for the sequential incentive conditions, but at a decreasing rate. There was no consistent difference in sample composition across the sequential incentive levels, although younger and more mobile adults were more likely to participate with sequential incentives. Costs per completion were similar for the $1 and $2 conditions ($51 and $54, respectively), but about $83 per complete for the $5 condition. Survey practitioners may consider using a $1 or $2 sequential incentive to increase response rates at a reasonable cost

Current Population Survey · Incentive · Liberian dollar · Population · Sample (material) · Survey data collection · Economic and Environmental Valuation · Survey Methodology and Nonresponse · Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques

  • Statistical Power Analysis

    Open Access•Jacob Cohen•Current Directions in Psychological…•1992

  • Internet, Phone, Mail, and Mixed‐Mode Surveys

    Don A Dillman, Jolene D Smyth et al.•Internet, Phone, Mail, and…•2014

  • When More Gets You Less

    Rebecca L Medway, J Fulton•Public Opinion Quarterly•2012

  • Experiments in Producing Nonresponse Bias

    Robert M Groves, Mick P Couper et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2006

  • How Much Gets You How Much? Monetary Incentives and Response Rates in Household Surveys

    Andrew Mercer, Andrew Caporaso et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2015

  • Leverage-Saliency Theory of Survey Participation

    Robert M Groves, Eleanor Singer et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2000

  • Effects of Sequential Prepaid Incentives and Envelope Messaging in Mail Surveys

    Jennifer Dykema, Karen Jaques et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2015

  • Understanding The Decision to Participate in a Survey

    Robert M Groves, Robert B Cialdini et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•1992

  • Surveying the General Public over the Internet Using Address-Based Sampling and Mail Contact Procedures

    Benjamin L Messer, D A Dillman•Public Opinion Quarterly•2011

  • The Use and Effects of Incentives in Surveys

    Open Access•Eleanor Singer, Cong Ye•The Annals of the American…•2013

Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae