Sociology, the public sphere, and modern government

There is an unfortunate tendency within some branches of sociology - particularly those usually called 'critical', that is, those associated with 'critical social theory'- to treat with disdain the understanding of the public sphere that many modern governments use daily in making and implementing public policy. The majority of sociologists in those branches seem to prefer, as part and parcel of their normative commitments, Jürgen Habermas's Kantian understanding of the public sphere, which focuses primarily on reason and morality and insists that these two forces are of a higher order than politics and law. This paper offers a set of criticisms of the Habermas-Kant understanding, arguing that its focus on reason and morality, were it to become more widespread, would steer sociology into public policy irrelevance. The paper goes on to describe a very different understanding of the public sphere, a politico-legal or civil-peace understanding which operates as the public policy focus of those governments that have relegated questions of salvation (whether religious or ideological) to the private sphere. This understanding emerged from early modern attempts to carve out a domain of relative freedom and security against the deadly violence of religious disputation sweeping across Europe. The paper readily acknowledges that some 'non-critical' branches of sociology already employ a version of this understanding

Civil society · Critical theory · Dominance (genetics · Epistemology · Ideology · Law and economics · Morality · Normative · Political science · Politics · Private sphere · Public sphere · Sociology · Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice · Critical Theory and Philosophy · Law · Weber, Simmel, Sociological Theory

• The Critical Theorist's Labour

  Richard Devetak, Ryan Walter•Globalizations•2016

  Incluir item

• Natural law as early social thought

  Open Access•Angela Leahy•History of the Human Sciences•2019

  Incluir item

• The public sphere in the twilight zone of publicness

  Open Access•Slavko Splichal•European Journal of Communication•2022

  Incluir item

• Ambiguities in Criminalizing Cartels

  Francis Haines, Caron Beaton–well et al.•The British Journal of Criminology•2012

  Incluir item

• Post-nationalism, sovereignty and the state

  Open Access•Gary Wickham•Journal of Sociology•2021

  Incluir item

• De-intellectualizing American sociology

  Open Access•Stephen P Turner, Stephen Turner•Journal of Sociology•2012

  Incluir item

• The core object 'society' and sociology's public relevance

  Open Access•Gary Wickham•Journal of Sociology•2012

  Incluir item

• A Theory of the Public Sphere

  Open Access•Ari Adut•Sociological Theory•2012

  Incluir item

• The Six Bookes of a Commonweale

  Jean Bodin, JeanHG Bodin et al.•Six Bookes of a Commonweale•1962

  Incluir item

• Kant

  Open Access•Immanuel Kant, Michael Friedman et al.•Kant•1991

  Incluir item

• The Gentle Civilizer of Nations

  Open Access•Martti Koskenniemi•Gentle Civilizer of Nations•2001

  Incluir item

• Rival Enlightenments

  Open Access•Ian Hunter•Rival Enlightenments•2001

  Incluir item

• Habermas and the public sphere

  Craig J Calhoun•Habermas and the public sphere•1992

  Incluir item

• Rich Democracies

  Harold L Wilensky•Rich Democracies•2002

  Incluir item

• Philosophy of Anthropology and Sociology

  Stephen Turner, Stephen P Turner et al.•Philosophy of anthropology and…•2007

  Incluir item

• Property and Power in Social Theory

  Dick Pels•Property and Power in Social Theory•1998

  Incluir item

• Weber

  Open Access•Max Weber, Peter Lassman et al.•Weber•1994

  Incluir item

• The Sinews of Power

  John Brewer, John D Brewer•Sinews of Power•2002

  Incluir item

• Public Sphere

  Open Access•Gerard Delanty•The Blackwell Encyclopedia of…•2007

  Incluir item

• Protecting Law from Morality’s Stalking Horse

  Open Access•Gary Wickham•Law/text/culture•2008

  Incluir item

• The Law-Morality Relation Revisited

  Gary Wickham•Griffith Law Review•2006

  Incluir item

• Public, Private and the Idea of the ‘Public Sphere’ in Early–modern England

  Conal Condren•Intellectual History Review•2009

  Incluir item

• Foucault, Law, and Power

  Open Access•Gary Wickham•Journal of Law and Society•2006

  Incluir item

• Spirituality and philosophy in post-structuralist theory

  Ian Hunter•History of European Ideas•2009

  Incluir item

• The limits of reason and some limitations of Weber's morality

  Open Access•Regis A Factor, Stephen P Turner et al.•Human Studies•1979

  Incluir item

• The History of the Social Movement in France, 1789-1850

  William H Harbold, Lorenz Von Stein et al.•The Western Political Quarterly•1966

  Incluir item

• Preaching, a Ponytail, and an Enthusiast

  Open Access•Michael J Sauter•Central European History•2004

  Incluir item

• In Praise of Bureaucracy

  Paul Du Gay•In Praise of Bureaucracy•2000

  Incluir item

• Max Weber

  Wilhelm Hennis•Max Weber•1988

  Incluir item

• Religion in the Public Sphere

  Open Access•Jürgen Habermas•European Journal of Philosophy•2006

  Incluir item

• Max Weber on Law in Economy and Society

  Max Rheinstein, Edward Shils•Harvard Law Review•1955

  Incluir item

• Expanding the Classical in Classical Sociology

  Open Access•Gary Wickham•Journal of Classical Sociology•2007

  Incluir item

• The social must be limited

  Open Access•Gary Wickham•Journal of Sociology•2008

  Incluir item

• Some Additional Knowledge Conditions for Sociology

  Open Access•Gary Wickham, Harry Freemantle•Current Sociology•2008

  Incluir item

• The History of Theory

  Hunter, Ian Hunter et al.•Critical Inquiry•2006

  Incluir item

• Max Weber and the Moral Economy of Office

  Paul Du Gay•Journal of Cultural Economy•2008

  Incluir item

• The material production of virtuality

  Donald Mackenzie•Economy and Society•2007

  Incluir item