We have nothing better than testimony

Art and testimony are often yoked together by the real-life violence of war. The First World War represents a moment in the French literary field which saw an explosion of war narratives. The legitimacy of some of these narratives was questioned after the war by Jean Norton Cru, who examined their validity as testimonies in a book significantly entitled Témoins. Following Ricœur's claim that historical discourse is, in any case, 'metaphorical', I argue that in fact these texts provoke an extension or revision of historical meaning and understanding, expressing a dynamic interrelation between the prefigured field of discursive forms and the fluctuating field of material happenings, and as such act as testimonies. They also, more widely, contribute to what Ricœur has called an 'ethics of memory

Nothing · Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity · Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration · Philosophy, History, and Historiography

• Recent Articles on French History

  Jean‐pierre V M Herubel, Jean-Pierre Hérubel•French Historical Studies•2022

  Incluir item

• Memory, History, Forgetting

  Paul Ricoeur, Kathleen Blamey et al.•Memory, History, Forgetting•2004

  Incluir item

• The Construction of Memory in Interwar France

  Stanley Hoffmann, Daniel J Sherman•Foreign Affairs•2000

  Incluir item

• Les Carnets de guerre de Louis Barthas, tonnelier 1914-1918

  Arthur Borghese, Rémy Cazals•Labour / Le Travail•1981

  Incluir item