A Minimalist Approach to to-Infinitival Complements in Belfast English

This article explores the distribution of to-infinitival complements (to-ICs) in Belfast English (BE) on the basis of Henry's (1992) data in order to capture two generalizations about Standard English (SE) to-ICs: the complementizer for is incompatible with PRO, and complementizerless to-ICs are TPs. Importantly, these generalizations cannot be drawn from Henry's CP analysis of BE to-ICs constructed within a representational approach. Thus, I advance a new analysis within the current minimalist framework (Chomsky (2000, 2001a, b)) on the basis of the idea that BE to-ICs have for which merges in T as a part of infinitival morphology and raises to C in the same way as V raises to v. I also propose BE-specific conditions on the selection of the categorial status of to-ICs. Further, I show two ways of capturing the nature of the adjacency condition within the minimalist framework

Adjacency list · Basis (linear algebra · Complementizer · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Lexicography and Language Studies · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation

• Modal Phrase, Movement, and To-Infinitival Clauses (T. Nomura, ModalP and Subjunctive Present)

  Open Access•Fuminori Matsubara•ENGLISH LINGUISTICS•2008

  Incluir item

• Multiple Spell-Out and Contraction at the Syntax-Phonology Interface

  Open Access•Yosuke Sato•Syntax•2012

  Incluir item

• Derivation by Phase

  Noam Chomsky•Ken Hale•2001

  Incluir item

• Clauses without complementizers

  Cathal Doherty•The Linguistic Review•1997

  Incluir item

• Infinitives in a for-to dialect

  Open Access•Alison Henry•Natural Language and Linguistic…•1992

  Incluir item

• Perception, selection, and structural economy

  Open Access•Ken Safir•Natural Language Semantics•1993

  Incluir item

• Null Case and the Distribution of PRO

  Roger Martins, Róger Martín•Linguistic Inquiry•2001

  Incluir item