I Don't Think You like Me
Examining Metaperceptions of Interpersonal Liking in Second Language Academic Interaction
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 5901035 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Pavel Trofimovich (0000-0001-6696-2411, Concordia University, autor correspondente), Rachel Lindberg (0000-0001-9897-103X, Concordia University), Anamaria Bodea (0000-0002-4881-2679, Concordia University), Thao-Nguyen Nina Le (0000-0002-8728-4178, Concordia University), Chaoqun Zheng (0009-0006-8658-2030, Concordia University), Kim Mcdonough (0000-0003-3165-9687, Concordia University) |
| Ano | 2023 |
| Volume | 8 |
| Fascículo | 3 |
| Páginas | 200 |
| Data de publicação | 2023-08-29 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Languages (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 2226-471X • E-ISSN: 2226-471X |
| Editora | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/languages8030200 |
| OpenAlex | W4386245244 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 4 |
| Referências citadas | 41 |
People often think about how they are perceived by others, but their perceptions (described as metaperceptions) are frequently off-target. Speakers communicating in their first language demonstrate a robust phenomenon, called the liking gap, where they consistently underestimate how much they are liked by their interlocutors. We extended this research to second language (L2) speakers to determine whether they demonstrate a similar negative bias and if it predicts willingness to engage in future interactions. We paired 76 English L2 university students with a previously unacquainted student to carry out a 10 min academic discussion task in English. After the conversation, students rated each other's interpersonal liking, speaking skill, and interactional behavior, provided their metaperceptions for their partner's ratings of the same dimensions, and assessed their willingness to engage in future interaction. We found a reliable interpersonal liking gap for all speakers, along with speaking skill and interaction behavior gaps for female speakers only. Only the female speakers (irrespective of their partner's gender) seemed to factor metaperceptions into their willingness to engage in future communication. We discuss the implications of these initial findings and call for further work into the role of metaperception in L2 communication
Conversation · Interpersonal communication · Interpersonal interaction · Perception · Phenomenon · Willingness to communicate · Communication · Communication in Education and Healthcare · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · Language, Metaphor, and Cognition · Psychology · Social Psychology
Sources of Human Psychological Differences
Exaggerated meta-perceptions predict intergroup hostility between American political partisans
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing
Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4
Do We Know the First Impressions We Make? Evidence for Idiographic Meta-Accuracy and Calibration of First Impressions
Teacher Expectations and Self-Fulfilling Prophecies
Agreeableness as a Moderator of Interpersonal Conflict
Should I Stay or Should I Go? International Students’ Decision-Making About Staying in Canada
Cascading Metaperceptions
Why do people avoid talking to strangers? A mini meta-analysis of predicted fears and actual experiences talking to a stranger
Sociometer theory and the pursuit of relational value
Do you make a better or worse impression than you think
Interpersonal sensitivity
Talking to strangers
The illusion of transparency and the alleviation of speech anxiety
Meta-accuracy and relationship quality
Social anxiety and liking
Perspective Taking as Egocentric Anchoring and Adjustment
Interpersonal perception and metaperception in nonoverlapping social groups
How chronic self-views influence (and potentially mislead) estimates of performance
The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2)
Insufficiently complimentary
How Big Is "Big"? Interpreting Effect Sizes in L2 Research
The need to belong
| Obras citantes distintas | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 2 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2024 - 2025 (2) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 4 |