Inequalities and Child Protection System Contact in Aotearoa New Zealand
Developing a Conceptual Framework and Research Agenda
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 5933245 |
|---|---|
| Autores | E Keddell (0000-0002-7217-6561, University of Otago, autor correspondente), Gabrielle Davies (0000-0001-5466-5364, University of Otago) |
| Ano | 2018 |
| Volume | 7 |
| Fascículo | 6 |
| Páginas | 89 |
| Data de publicação | 2018-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Social Sciences (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 2076-0760 • E-ISSN: 2076-0760 |
| Editora | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/socsci7060089 |
| OpenAlex | W2807296503 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 13 |
| Referências citadas | 55 |
There is a growing movement to integrate conceptual tools from the health inequalities field into research that examines the relationship between inequalities and chances of child protection system contact. This article outlines the key concepts of an inequalities perspective, and discusses how these apply to inequalities in child protection in the Aotearoa New Zealand context. Drawing on existing research, this article shows that while there is evidence of links between deprivation, ethnicity, location and system contact, a more systematic research agenda shaped by an inequalities perspective would contribute to understanding more fully the social determinants of contact with the child protection system. An inequalities perspective provides balance to the current 'social investment' policy approach that targets individuals and families for service provision, with little attention to how structural inequalities impact on system contact. Directions for research are discussed, with some specific questions suggested. These include questions relating to the relationships between social inequalities and various decision points in the child protection system; if a social gradient exists and how steep it is; the inter-relationship between ethnicity, deprivation and patterns of system contact; and how similarly deprived children in different locations compare with each other in relation to child protection system contact, that is, is there an 'inverse intervention law' operating
Aotearoa · Child protection · Context (archaeology · Economic growth · Economics · Inequality · Political science · Public relations · Social inequality · Sociology · Child Abuse and Trauma · Child Welfare and Adoption · Gender Studies · Homelessness and Social Issues · Law
Indigenous Children and Young People in Residential Care
What happens after a child protection report during pregnancy? Using administrative data to explore 12-month outcomes
Cuts both ways
Problematizing Child Maltreatment
Understanding the Relationships Among Poverty, Child Maltreatment, and Child Protection Involvement
Ethnic inequalities in child welfare
Parenting Support for Mothers Raised in Out‐Of‐Home Care
Child protection inequalities for Pasifika children in Aotearoa New Zealand
Agency support for at‐risk families
Recognising the embedded child in child protection
Fostering the family, not just the child
Child protection inequalities in Aotearoa New Zealand
Child welfare inequalities in an egalitarian nation
Child Protection Systems
Racial Bias in Child Protection? A Comparison of Competing Explanations Using National Data
Placement decisions and disparities among aboriginal groups
Mandated reporting
Culture and context in understanding child maltreatment
Racial and ethnic disparities
Income Inequality and Child Maltreatment in the United States
Neighborhood-level social processes and substantiated cases of child maltreatment
How neighborhoods influence child maltreatment
The continuing role of material factors in child maltreatment and placement
Intergenerational transmission of child abuse and neglect
‘From dangerousness to risk’
Child welfare inequalities
Social work, poverty, and child welfare interventions
Inequalities in English child protection practice under austerity
Inequalities in child welfare intervention rates
Neighborhood racial & ethnic diversity as a predictor of child welfare system involvement
An examination of class-based visibility bias in national child maltreatment reporting
Bias, racism and evidence-based practice
Racial/ethnic disparity in child welfare systems
Poverty, social disadvantage, and the black/white placement gap
African American disproportionality and disparity in child welfare
Pathways of risk and resilience between neighborhood socioeconomic conditions and parenting
Is the overrepresentation of the poor in child welfare caseloads due to bias or need
The relationship between child welfare financing, screening, and substantiation
Intersections of individual and neighborhood disadvantage
Exploring inequities in child welfare and child protection services
Race and child maltreatment reporting
A comparative study of child welfare systems
Examining racial disproportionality in child protective services case decisions
Racialized perceptions and child neglect
Introduction to the special issue on the economic causes and consequences of child maltreatment
Disentangling substantiation
Money matters
Determining risk for child physical harm through the classification of economic insecurity
Cumulative Prevalence of Maltreatment Among New Zealand Children, 1998–2015
Inequalities in Child Welfare
Poverty and Decision Making in Child Welfare and Protection
When and How Does Ethnicity Matter? A Cross-National Study of Social Work Responses to Ethnicity in Child Protection Cases
Referrals and Child Protection in England
Race, Poverty and Child Protection Decision Making
The Effect of Additional Child Support Income on the Risk of Child Maltreatment
Dependency denied
Ethnic density and area deprivation
Managing anxiety
The significance of socially-assigned ethnicity for self-identified Māori accessing and engaging with primary healthcare in New Zealand
| Obras citantes distintas | 13 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 1,86 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2019 - 2026 (8) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 13 |