Comparing Near Eastern Neolithic Megasites and Southwestern Pueblos

Population Size, Exceptionalism and Historical Trajectories

Dados Bibliográficos

ID6044528
AutoresWesley Bernardini (University of Redlands, autor correspondente), Gregson Schachner (University of California, Los Angeles)
Ano2018
Volume28
Fascículo4
Páginas647-663
Data de publicação2018-11-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoCambridge Archaeological Journal (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0959-7743 • E-ISSN: 1474-0540
EditoraCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0959774318000276
OpenAlexW2806508423
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas7
Referências citadas66

Çatalhöyük and other Near Eastern Neolithic ‘megasites’ are commonly interpreted as exceptional because of their large size and early dates. In this paper, we question exceptional claims about the size and social organization of megasites like Çatalhöyük by comparing them to pueblos in the American Southwest. We argue that Çatalhöyük and other Near Eastern Neolithic megasites are better understood as large villages whose size, layout and social organization compare readily to many of the late prehispanic and historic-period pueblos in the American Southwest. We suggest that four factors contribute to disparate interpretations of structurally similar sites in the Near East and American Southwest: 1) surface architectural visibility; 2) different regional intellectual traditions that emphasize ‘micro’ versus ‘macro’ scale social organization; 3) a tendency toward overestimation in archaeological population estimates, especially when the ‘biggest’ or the ‘earliest’ sites are involved; and 4) perceptions of continuity with later time periods

Archaeology · Exceptionalism · Geography · Political science · Population · Population size · Social organization · Sociology · Visibility · Anthropology · Archaeology and ancient environmental studies · Archaeology and Rock Art Studies · Demography · History · Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology