The Political Scientist as Expert Witness
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 6098524 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Richard L Engstrom (Duke University), Michael P Mcdonald (0000-0002-3717-4405, George Mason University) |
| Ano | 2011 |
| Volume | 44 |
| Fascículo | 2 |
| Páginas | 285-289 |
| Data de publicação | 2011-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | PS Political Science & Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1049-0965 • E-ISSN: 1537-5935 |
| Editora | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s1049096511000072 |
| OpenAlex | W1995124628 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 2 |
| Referências citadas | 16 |
Political scientists serve in courtrooms as expert witnesses on many topics related to their professional training: elections, same-sex marriages, employer sanctions for hiring undocumented aliens, school desegregation, political asylum requests, property rights, and racial profiling, among many others. It is not by chance that we—the authors—have chosen to testify as experts in cases concerning elections (see also Cain 1999). Election-related cases compose a large percentage of all cases involving political scientists brought to court: a study of references to expert testimony by political scientists in published federal district court decisions from 1950 through 1989 reports that 61% involved election law issues (Leigh 1991). Our replication of this study for the period of 2000 through December 18, 2010, reveals that 74% of such cases (28 of 38) involved election law issues. These cases involved issues of minority vote dilution, redistricting, alternative election systems (cumulative and limited voting), campaign financing, voting equipment and invalid ballots, voter registration, nominating petition requirements, and a number of other issues
Election law · Expert witness · Federal election · Federal law · Legislation · Political science · Politics · Redistricting · Sanctions · Voter registration · Voting · Witness · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Legal and Constitutional Studies · Public Administration
The Paradox of Representation
Expert vs. Expert
For the Plaintiffs
Are Expert Witnesses Whores? Reflections on Objectivity in Scholarship and Expert Witnessing
Commentary
Law and Data
Pruning Thorns from the Thicket
A Unified Method of Evaluating Electoral Systems and Redistricting Plans
The Law and Economics of the Economic Expert Witness
The Expert Witness
Do Majority-Minority Districts Maximize Substantive Black Representation in Congress
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,22 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2017 - 2022 (6) |
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 2 |