Assessing the Effectiveness of Anchoring Vignettes in Bias Reduction for Socioeconomic Disparities in Self-rated Health among Chinese Adults
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 6169568 |
|---|---|
| Autores | H Xu (0000-0001-9227-8904, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, autor correspondente), Y Xie (0000-0002-3240-8620, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA, and Peking University, Beijing, China) |
| Ano | 2015 |
| Volume | 46 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Páginas | 84-120 |
| Data de publicação | 2015-09-18 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Sociological Methodology (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0081-1750 • E-ISSN: 1467-9531 |
| Editora | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0081175015599808 |
| PMID | 27721523 |
| OpenAlex | W2339261265 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 19 |
| Referências citadas | 50 |
The authors investigate how reporting heterogeneity may bias socioeconomic and demographic disparities in self-rated general health, a widely used health indicator, and how such bias can be adjusted by using new anchoring vignettes designed in the 2012 wave of the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS). The authors find systematic variation by sociodemographic characteristics in thresholds used by respondents in rating their general health status. Such threshold shifts are often nonparallel in that the effect of a certain group characteristic on the shift is stronger at one level than another. The authors find that the resulting bias of measuring group differentials in self-rated health can be too substantial to be ignored. They demonstrate that the CFPS anchoring vignettes prove to be an effective survey instrument in obtaining bias-adjusted estimates of health disparities not only for the CFPS sample but also for an independent sample from the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. Effective adjustment for reporting heterogeneity may require vignette administration only to a small subsample (20 percent to 30 percent of the full sample). Using a single vignette can be as effective as using more in terms of anchoring, but the results are sensitive to the choice of vignette design
Anchoring · Environmental health · Health equity · Public health · Self-rated health · Socioeconomic status · Employment and Welfare Studies · Health disparities and outcomes · Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving · Medicine · Psychology · Social Psychology · Gerontology
Longitudinal validity of self-rated health
The Mediation Effect of Perceived Attitudes toward Medical Service on the Association between Public Satisfaction with the Overall Medical Service and Self-Rated Health among the General Population in China
Mind matters
Differences in rating of health related quality of life on the EQ-5D-5 L between ethnic groups
Reporting heterogeneity and health measurement bias in older adults
Life Satisfaction among Different Groups of Children
Urbanization, socioeconomic status and health disparity in China
Linear trend or graded association
Marital Status and Self-Rated Health in China
The Impact of the City-Level Intergenerational Mobility on Health
Market Transition, Social Stratification, and Health Disparities in China
Research in and Prospects for the Measurement of Health Using Self-Rated Health
Social capital, deprivation and self-rated health
Estimating rural-urban disparities in self-rated health in China
Market Transition, Multidimensional Socioeconomic Status, and Health Disparities in Urban China
Causal Inference Between the Health Status and Living Arrangements of Elderly People in China
Does Subjective Social Status Predict Self-Rated Health in Chinese Adults and Why
Rural-to-urban Migration and Rising Evaluation Standards for Subjective Social Status in Contemporary China
Socioeconomic Inequalities in Health in China
Socioeconomic inequalities in health
When Mental Health Becomes Health
Vignettes and Self-Reports of Work Disability in the United States and the Netherlands
Differential health reporting by education level and its impact on the measurement of health inequalities among older Europeans
Comparability of self rated health
Education and Self-Rated Health
True health vs response styles
Does reporting heterogeneity bias the measurement of health disparities?
Cohort Profile
The bell curve
Self-Rated Health and Mortality
Socioeconomic Status and Health among Older Adults in Rural and Urban China
Response Styles in Cross-national Survey Research
Neighborhood effects on health among migrants and natives in Shanghai, China
Does Self-reported Health Bias the Measurement of Health Inequalities in U.S. Adults? Evidence Using Anchoring Vignettes From the Health and Retirement Study
The Impact of China's Market Reforms on the Health of Chinese Citizens
Provincial income inequality and self-reported health status in China during 1991–7
Longitudinal study of associations between perceived health status and self reported diseases in the French Gazel cohort
What does self rated health measure? Results from the British Whitehall II and French Gazel cohort studies
Socioeconomic inequalities in morbidity among the elderly; a European overview
Socioeconomic status and health among the aged in the United States and Germany
The Links Between Education and Health
Can We Afford Better Health? A Study of the Health Differentials in China
Self-reported health and adult mortality risk
Socioeconomic status and health among older adults in Thailand
Social Change and Socioeconomic Disparities in Health over the Life Course in China
Enhancing the Validity and Cross-Cultural Comparability of Measurement in Survey Research
A Cross-National Examination of the Determinants of Self-Assessed Health
Are Black Older Adults Health-Pessimistic
Self-Ratings of Health among the Old and the Old-Old
Using Anchoring Vignettes to Assess Group Differences in General Self-Rated Health
Cumulative Advantage Processes as Mechanisms of Inequality in Life Course Health
Chocolate city, vanilla suburbs
The vignette as an experimental approach to the study of social status
| Obras citantes distintas | 19 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 1,9 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2016 - 2025 (10) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 19 |