Marx et le lumpenprolétariat

Dados Bibliográficos

ID6177439
AutoresJean-Claude Bourdin
Ano2013
Volume54
Fascículo2
Páginas39-55
Data de publicação2013-10-03
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoActuel Marx (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0994-4524 • E-ISSN: 1969-6728
EditoraCAIRN (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.3917/amx.054.0039
OpenAlexW1965038191
IdiomaFR
Citações recebidas5

Marx's use of the word "lumpenproletariat" first strikes us by its violence: the term functions as a derogatory stigmatization of heterogeneous groups whose social position is essentially one that is determined by the sphere of exchange and pure circulation in a service economy. The study of Marx's use of the term demonstrates that it is not a concept: it alludes to the problem posed by the participation of proletarians in the repression of June 1848 or by the lazzaroni in the failure of the liberal revolutions. The term does not designate a "class". Its use is rather to identify a type of behavior evident at all levels of the society: predation, enrichment by misappropriation, the improductive speculations undertaken by the "declasses" of a society's "Bohème". The hypothesis advanced here is that Marx's articulation between the lumpenproletariat and the importance of the ethical evaluation of its tenuous relation to work partly derives from the Hegelian conception of poverty (the "social question"). An analysis of the "inhuman" needs and the speculative deduction of the proletariat in 1844 demonstrates that the negative determinations of the proletariat establish the lumpenproletariat as the proletariat of the proletariat. The difference is then located in the revolutionary subjectivity of the proletarians, to which the members of the lumpenproletariat do not accede

Hegelianism · Political science · Politics · Proletariat · Sociology · Political Economy and Marxism · Social and Economic Solidarity · Social Sciences and Governance · Law