Who influences meta-accuracy? It takes two to know the impressions we make

Dados Bibliográficos

ID6204422
AutoresNorhan Elsaadawy (0000-0002-2773-9601, University of Toronto), Erika N Carlson (0009-0006-6058-8821, University of Toronto), Lauren J Human (0000-0001-8384-2075, McGill University)
Ano2021
Volume121
Fascículo1
Páginas201-214
Data de publicação2021-07-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoJournal of Personality and Social Psychology (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0022-3514 • E-ISSN: 1939-1315
EditoraAmerican Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1037/pspp0000376
PMID33180543
OpenAlexW3094624557
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas10

191). Metaperceivers tended to have the most robust influence on meta-accuracy, but perceivers and especially dyads influenced accuracy as well. This suggests there are "good" metaperceivers, perceivers, and dyads of meta-accuracy and that a more complete understanding of meta-accuracy must consider both members of an interaction. As a first step in understanding how both individuals influence accuracy, we tested the role of self-perception, specifically if some metaperceivers, perceivers, or dyads fostered accuracy because metaperceivers happened to be seen as they saw themselves. Perceivers largely fostered accuracy by seeing metaperceivers as they saw themselves but metaperceivers and dyads mostly fostered accuracy by other means. Potential contextual effects are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved)

Impression formation · Perception · Social perception · Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior · Mental Health Research Topics · Personality Traits and Psychology · Psychology · Social Psychology