Are indigenous personality dimensions culture specific? Philippine inventories and the five-factor model

Dados Bibliográficos

ID6205873
AutoresMarcia S Katigbak (Washington State University), A Timothy Church (0009-0002-3463-4338), Ma Angeles Guanzon-Lapeña, Annadaisy J Carlota, Gregorio H Del Pilar
Ano2002
Volume82
Fascículo1
Páginas89-101
Data de publicação2002-01-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoJournal of Personality and Social Psychology (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0022-3514 • E-ISSN: 1939-1315
EditoraAmerican Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1037//0022-3514.82.1.89
PMID11811638
OpenAlexW2065382241
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas44
Referências citadas5

The authors addressed the culture specificity of indigenous personality constructs, the generalizability of the 5-factor model (FFM), and the incremental validity of indigenous measures in a collectivistic culture. Filipino college students (N = 508) completed 3 indigenous inventories and the Filipino version of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R). On the basis of the factor and regression analyses, they concluded that (a) most Philippine dimensions are well encompassed by the FFM and thus may not be very culture specific: (b) a few indigenous constructs are less well accounted for by the FFM: these constructs are not unknown in Western cultures, but they may be particularly salient or composed somewhat differently in the Philippines; (c) the structure of the NEO-PI-R FFM replicates well in the Philippines: and (d) Philippine inventories add modest incremental validity beyond the FFM in predicting selected culture-relevant criteria.

Big Five personality traits · Collectivism · Developmental psychology · Factor (programming language) · Generalizability theory · Indigenous · Individualism · Personality · Cultural Differences and Values · Emotional Intelligence and Performance · Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences · Personality Traits and Psychology · Psychology · Social Psychology