Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Taking the Law to Court

Citizen Suits and the Legislative Process

Dados Bibliográficos

ID6230001
AutoresMarion Dumas (0000-0001-7847-479X, Santa Fe Institute, autor correspondente)
Ano2017
Volume61
Fascículo4
Páginas944-957
Data de publicação2017-10-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoAmerican Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0092-5853 • E-ISSN: 1540-5907
EditoraWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/ajps.12302
OpenAlexW2607496602
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas4
Referências citadas28

The institution of citizen suits is a decentralized form of public participation that allows citizens to influence the implementation of public laws in courts. How does this institution influence policymaking? This article proposes a model of citizen suits. It then analyzes how this institution influences legislative decisions. The legislature bargains to choose the budget, distributive spending, and spending on an ideologically contested public good (e.g., health care or environmental protection). I find that citizen suits enable courts to forge a compromise between opponents and proponents of the public good by responding to the diverse claims of citizens. Anticipating the mobilization of citizens in courts, legislators in turn craft more socially efficient bills, with less distributive spending, which better represent the distribution of preferences for the public good compared to when citizens have no role in the implementation of legislation

Business · Compromise · Craft · Distributive property · Economics · Ideology · Institution · Law and economics · Legislation · Legislative process · Legislature · Political science · Politics · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Legal and Constitutional Studies · Public Administration

  • Climate change litigation

    Open Access•Joana Setzer, Lisa Vanhala•Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews…•2019

  • Why some EU institutions litigate more often than others

    Miriam Hartlapp•Journal of European Integration•2018

  • Anticipated Adjudication

    Open Access•Scott Limbocker, William G Resh et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2022

  • Environmental Public Interest Litigation in China

    Open Access•Lei Xie, Lu Xu•Transnational Environmental Law•2021

  • The Robust Federation

    Open Access•Jenna Bednar•Robust Federation•2008

  • Adversarial Legalism

    Open Access•Robert A Kagan•Adversarial Legalism•2001

  • A positive theory of statutory interpretation

    Open Access•John Ferejohn, John A Ferejohn et al.•International Review of Law and…•1992

  • Judicializing Politics, Politicizing Law

    Open Access•John Ferejohn•Law and Contemporary Problems•2002

  • The eclipse of legislatures

    Open Access•John G Matsusaka•Policy Challenges and Political…•2005

  • Incompletely Theorized Agreements

    Cass R Sunstein•Harvard Law Review•1995

  • Courting Social Justice

    Open Access•Daniel Brinks, Justice Richard J Goldstone et al.•Courting Social Justice•2008

  • Judicial Policy Making and the Modern State

    Open Access•Anthony M Bertelli•Journal of Policy Analysis and…•1999

  • The Legislative Design of Judicial Review

    Open Access•Charles R Shipan•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2000

  • The eclipse of legislatures

    Open Access•John G Matsusaka•Public Choice•2005

  • Suing for Europe

    Open Access•R Daniel Kelemen•Comparative Political Studies•2006

  • A Theory of Competitive Partisan Lawmaking

    Open Access•Keith Krehbiel, Adam Meirowitz et al.•Political Science Research and…•2015

  • Business as usual

    Open Access•Frederick J Boehmke, Sean Gailmard et al.•Journal of Public Policy•2013

  • When and how can advocacy groups promote new technologies? Conditions and strategies for effectiveness

    Open Access•Sung Eun Kim, Johannes Urpelainen•Journal of Public Policy•2013

  • Reconsidering Judicial Preferences

    Lee Epstein, Jack Knight•Annual Review of Political Science•2013

  • Presidential Pork

    Open Access•Nolan Mccarty, Nolan M Mccarty•American Political Science Review•2000

  • Legislatures, Bureaucracies, and Distributive Spending

    Open Access•Michael M Ting•American Political Science Review•2012

  • Bargaining in Legislatures

    Open Access•David P Baron, John Ferejohn et al.•American Political Science Review•1989

  • Legal Mobilization

    Open Access•Frances Kahn Zemans•American Political Science Review•1983

  • Bargaining in Legislatures over Particularistic and Collective Goods

    Open Access•Craig Volden, Alan E Wiseman•American Political Science Review•2007

Obras citantes distintas4
Citações por ano0,5
Intervalo de citações2018 - 2022 (5)
Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 4
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae