Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Executive-legislative competition in agenda setting

An analysis of longitudinal changes in South Korea

Dados Bibliográficos

ID6233685
AutoresDoo-Rae Kim (Korea University, autor correspondente)
Ano2017
Volume25
Fascículo3
Páginas383-400
Data de publicação2017-09-02
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoAsian Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0218-5377 • E-ISSN: 1750-7812
EditoraInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/02185377.2017.1352525
OpenAlexW2737370218
IdiomaEN
Referências citadas39

The historical patterns of executive dominance in national policymaking have undergone a rapid transformation in South Korea. In the context of an emerging institutional rivalry between the executive and legislative branches in forming national policies, this study examines a causal nexus among the agenda power parity, jurisdictional complexity, and the scope and diversity of the national agenda space. A series of data analyses on various original measures of the key variables reveal that the two dimensions of the national agenda space have been reshaped via different causal processes. While the rise of the legislative power in agenda setting and the complexity of legislative jurisdictions tend to increase the scope of the national agenda space, democratic transition subsumes the influence of all other factors in increasing the diversity of the national agenda space

Diversity (politics · Dominance (genetics · Economics · Legislature · National power · Nexus (standard · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Regionalisation · Rivalry · Scope (computer science · Sociology · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Policy Transfer and Learning · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Public Administration

  • Positive Theories of Congressional Institutions

    Kenneth Shepsle, Barry Weingast•Positive theories of congressional…•1995

  • Presidents and Assemblies

    Open Access•Matthew Soberg Shugart, John Michael Carey•Presidents and Assemblies•1992

  • Power without Persuasion

    William G Howell•Power Without Persuasion•2003

  • Setting the Agenda

    Open Access•Gary W Cox, Mathew D Mccubbins•Setting the Agenda•2005

  • Pushing the Agenda

    Open Access•Matthew N Beckmann•Pushing the Agenda•2010

  • Turf Wars

    David C King, David King•Turf Wars•1997

  • The presidential power of unilateral action

    Terry M Moe, T Moe•The Journal of Law Economics and…•1999

  • Agendas, alternatives, and public policies

    John W Kingdon•Agendas, alternatives, and public…•1995

  • The Politics Of Democratization In Korea

    Sunhyuk Kim•Politics of Democratization in…•2000

  • Introduction

    Open Access•Russell J Dalton, Yun‐han Chu et al.•Journal of East Asian Studies•2007

  • Committees and the core of the Constitution

    Open Access•Gary J Miller, Thomas H Hammond•Public Choice•1990

  • The Industrial Organization of Congress; or, Why Legislatures, Like Firms, Are Not Organized as Markets

    Barry R Weingast, William Marshall et al.•Journal of Political Economy•1988

  • Agenda Dynamics and Policy Subsystems

    F R Baumgartner, Bryan D Jones•The Journal of Politics•1991

  • Parliamentary Agenda Control and Legislative Outcomes in Western Europe

    Open Access•Herbert Doring•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2001

  • The Role of Committees in Agenda Setting in the U. S. Congress

    Open Access•Barbara Sinclair•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1986

  • The Rise of Bureaucratic Authoritarianism in South Korea

    Open Access•Hyug Baeg Im•World Politics•1987

  • Attention to Issues in a System of Separated Powers

    Roy B Flemming, B Dan Wood et al.•The Journal of Politics•1999

  • Advocacy versus Certainty

    John W Hardin•The Journal of Politics•1998

  • The Impact of Democratic Transition on Elections and Parties in South Korea

    Open Access•Uk Heo, Hans Stockton•Party Politics•2005

  • Political Control and Bureaucratic Autonomy Revisited

    Soo Yeon Kim, D-R Kim•Journal of Public Administration…•2006

  • The national assembly of the republic of Korea

    Chan Wook Park•Journal of Legislative Studies•1998

  • Intra-Party Politics and Minority Coalition Government in South Korea

    Open Access•Youngmi Kim, Young‐mi Kim•Japanese Journal of Political…•2008

  • Legislative agenda‐setting in parliamentary democracies

    Open Access•Thomas Bräuninger, Marc Debus•European Journal of Political…•2009

  • Faltering democratic consolidation in South Korea

    Hyug Baeg Im•Democratization•2004

  • Latin America's Reactive Assemblies and Proactive Presidents

    Gary W Cox, Morgenstern et al.•Comparative Politics•2001

  • Nonlegislative Hearings and Policy Change in Congress

    Jeffery C Talbert, Jeffery Talbert et al.•American Journal of Political…•1995

  • Punctuated Equilibrium in Comparative Perspective

    Open Access•F R Baumgartner, Christian Breunig et al.•American Journal of Political…•2009

  • Structure and Opportunity

    Open Access•Adam D Sheingate, Adam Sheingate•American Journal of Political…•2006

  • Decision Making in Political Systems

    Open Access•George Tsebelis•British Journal of Political…•1995

  • Who Influences Whom? The President, Congress, and the Media

    Open Access•George C Edwards, B Dan Wood•American Political Science Review•1999

  • The Core of the Constitution

    Open Access•Thomas H Hammond, Gary J Miller•American Political Science Review•1987

  • The Destruction of Issue Monopolies in Congress

    Open Access•Bryan D Jones, F R Baumgartner et al.•American Political Science Review•1993

Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae