The Politics of Rights Protection in Western Democracies

This article examines two contentious rights debates – prisoner voting and gay marriage – in five Western democracies in order to assess the impact of different methods of rights protection. The five countries share similar political and legal histories, but two of them (the United States and Canada) have constitutional bills of rights, two (New Zealand and the United Kingdom) have legislative bills of rights, and one (Australia) has no national bill of rights. The article examines whether the existence of bills of rights has affected the outcome of debates on prisoner voting and gay marriage in the countries in question. The article concludes that, although, in general, the existence of a bill of rights has tended to correlate to the improved position of marginalised groups in these particular debates, that has not uniformly been the case. Moreover, even when bills of rights appear to have been relevant, their connection to the outcomes has not always been a linear one

Bill of rights · Democracy · Economics · Fundamental rights · Human rights · International human rights law · Legislature · Minority rights · Order (exchange · Political science · Politics · Position (finance · Right to property · Voting · African Sexualities and LGBTQ+ Issues · Gender Politics and Representation · Human Rights and Development · Law

• Foreign and comparative politics in the Australian Journal of Political Science

  Roderic Pitty•Australian Journal of Political…•2015

  Incluir item

• The Rights Revolution

  Charles R Epp•Rights Revolution•1998

  Incluir item

• Locked OutFelon Disenfranchisement and American Democracy

  Jeff Manza, Christopher Uggen•Locked out•2006

  Incluir item

• The Hollow Hope

  K L Scheppele, Gerald N Rosenberg et al.•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1992

  Incluir item

• Evaluating the Human Rights Performance of Legislatures

  C Evans, Carla A Evans et al.•Human Rights Law Review•2006

  Incluir item