An Experiment in Political Communication
The British Columbia Citizens' Assembly on Electoral Reform
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 6234628 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Ian Ward (0000-0002-0566-1479), I M Ward (0000-0001-8398-4911, The University of Queensland, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2008 |
| Volume | 43 |
| Fascículo | 2 |
| Páginas | 301-315 |
| Data de publicação | 2008-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Australian Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1036-1146 • E-ISSN: 1363-030X |
| Editora | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/10361140802035796 |
| OpenAlex | W2003082443 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 6 |
| Referências citadas | 10 |
The British Columbian Citizens' Assembly on Electoral Reform comprised a representative group of 160 randomly selected voters who were empowered to review the Province's electoral system and to decide if change was needed. It first met in January 2004 and issued its final report in December of that year. The Assembly has since been hailed as a democratic invention and attracted worldwide interest as a remarkable experiment in deliberative democracy. Its Terms of Reference required that it consult British Columbians. It did so via a series of public hearings held across the Province, and by establishing a website to publicise its purpose and to obtain public input. Hence, the Citizens' Assembly provides a case study or natural experiment that permits the comparative assessment of two very different forms of political communication – one traditional and the other a form of ‘e-consultation’, relying on newer information and communications technology. Based on published sources, as well as interviews with former members of the Assembly, this paper investigates the public input the Assembly obtained, and considers whether ‘e-consultation’– as is often claimed – does allow citizens to genuinely contribute to the making of public policy. Notes 1I thank Cary Laing, Bob Westfall, Harley Nyen, Ray Jones, Gene Quan, Ken Nielsen, Edith Davidson, Wendy Bergerund, Mary Jarbek, Craig Henschell, Sheilla MacDermott and Frankie Kirby for agreeing to share their experience as Assembly members. All were interviewed for this study in late March or early April 2006. 2The data used here are from a series of surveys of Assembly members conducted during 2004 by R.K. Carty, A. Blais and P. Fournier for their British Columbia Citizens' Assembly Study, and are used with permission. They are drawn from Wave 3 (Q.4) and Wave 7 (Q. o2). Additional informationNotes on contributorsIan Ward Ian Ward is a Reader in Politics at the University of Queensland, where he teaches courses in Australian politics and political communication
Democracy · Electoral reform · Electoral system · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · E-Government and Public Services · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Public Administration · Social Media and Politics
Evaluating the Quality and Impact of Online Patient Forums in Genomic Data Governance
Foreign and comparative politics in the Australian Journal of Political Science
Public policy in the Australian Journal of Political Science
The Lessons and Limitations of Experiments in Democratic Deliberation
The Australian Citizens' Parliament
The Limits of Deliberative Democracy and Empowerment
Future Directions for Public Deliberation
The Chinese Communist Party and Deliberative Democracy
From consultation to participatory governance? A critical review of citizen engagement strategies in Queensland
Bringing E-Democracy Back In
Interaction between States and Citizens in the Age of the Internet
The Digital Divide
| Obras citantes distintas | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 0,38 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2010 - 2026 (17) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 6 |