Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Barrister gender and litigant success in the High Court of Australia

Dados Bibliográficos

ID6235056
AutoresRussell Smyth (0000-0001-6593-5462, Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute), Vinod Mishra (0000-0002-4686-5195, Australian Regenerative Medicine Institute)
Ano2014
Volume49
Fascículo1
Páginas1-21
Data de publicação2014-01-02
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoAustralian Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1036-1146 • E-ISSN: 1363-030X
EditoraInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/10361146.2013.875516
OpenAlexW2059116067
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas5
Referências citadas37

We examine the relationship between gender of the barrister and appeal outcomes on the High Court of Australia. We find that an appellant represented in oral argument by a female barrister, opposed to a respondent represented in oral argument by a male barrister, is less likely to receive a High Court justice's vote. However, we also find that the appellant disadvantage of having a female barrister present oral argument is (partially) offset in the case of liberal justices and on panels having a higher proportion of female justices. The extent to which the disadvantage is offset, and potentially turns from being a disadvantage to an advantage, depends on the degree to which the justice is liberal and the proportion of female justices on the panel.本文探讨律师性别与诉讼结果之间的关系。我们发现这个过程并不对称。如果是由女律师上诉,而辩方是一个或一个以上男性律师,那么性别就是一个因素。不过并不存在相反的情况。我们具体发现,如果诉方是一个女律师,辩方为一男律师,诉方就不大可能获得最高法官的赞同。不过,我们还发现,如果法官具有自由主义精神,如果法官团的女性比例较高,那么女律师的不利情形就有可能被(部分地)抵消。被抵消的程度取决于法官自由精神的强弱,和法官团女性比例的大小

Appeal · Argument (complex analysis · Disadvantage · Economic Justice · High Court · Political science · Respondent · Sociology · Gender Politics and Representation · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies

  • Women, gender and feminism in the Australian Journal of Political Science

    Carol Johnson•Australian Journal of Political…•2015

  • Institutional Design and the Predictability of Judicial Interruptions at Oral Argument

    Open Access•Tonja Jacobi, Patrick Leslie et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2024

  • Judicial Ideology in the Absence of Rights

    Open Access•Zoë Robinson, Patrick Leslie et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2021

  • You Think; Therefore I Am

    Open Access•Shane A Gleason, Emilee Smart•Political Research Quarterly•2023

  • Judging government economic performance

    William M Myers•Australian Journal of Political…•2020

  • Human inference

    Richard E Nisbett•Human inference•1980

  • Sample Selection Bias as a Specification Error

    James J Heckman•Econometrica•1979

  • Have We Come a Long Way, Baby? The Influence of Attorney Gender on Supreme Court Decision Making

    Open Access•John Szmer, John J Szmer et al.•Politics & Gender•2010

  • Explaining historical dissent rates in the high court of Australia

    Russell Smyth•Commonwealth and Comparative…•2003

  • A Century of Appointments But Only One Woman

    Open Access•Rachel Davis, George W Williams et al.•Alternative Law Journal•2003

  • Feminist Jurisprudence and Political Vision

    Open Access•Adelaide H Villmoare•Law & Social Inquiry•1999

  • Beyond Gender Schemas

    Open Access•Virginia Valian•Hypatia•2005

  • Selecting Appeals for Judicial Review in Canada

    Roy B Flemming, Glen S Krutz et al.•The Journal of Politics•2002

  • The Impact of Candidate Sex on Evaluations of Candidates for the U.S. House of Representatives

    Open Access•Kathleen Dolan•Social Science Quarterly•2004

  • The role of attitudinal, institutional and environmental factors in explaining variations in the dissent rate on the High Court of Australia

    Russell Smyth•Australian Journal of Political…•2005

  • Endogeneity in Probit Response Models

    Open Access•David A Freedman, Jasjeet S Sekhon•Political Analysis•2010

  • Lawyers, Justices, and Issue Salience

    Open Access•Andrea Mcatee, Kevin T Mcguire•Law & Society Review•2007

  • Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices

    Open Access•Jeffrey A Segal, Albert D Cover•American Political Science Review•1989

  • The Influence of Oral Arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court

    Open Access•Timothy R Johnson, Paul J Wahlbeck et al.•American Political Science Review•2006

  • The Impact of Attorney Gender on Decision Making in the United States Courts of Appeals

    John Szmer, Erin B Kaheny et al.•Women & Politics•2013

  • Gender and Power in American Legislative Discourse

    Laura R Winsky Mattei•The Journal of Politics•1998

  • Repeat Players in the Supreme Court

    Kevin T Mcguire•The Journal of Politics•1995

  • The Diversification of the Federal Bench

    Thomas G Walker, Tom Walker et al.•The Journal of Politics•1985

  • Judicial Politicization, Ideology, and Activism at the High Courts of the United States, Canada, and Australia

    Open Access•David L Weiden•Political Research Quarterly•2011

  • Women Lawyers before the Supreme Court of Canada

    Open Access•Erin B Kaheny, John Szmer et al.•Canadian Journal of Political…•2011

  • Repeat Litigators and Agenda Setting on the Supreme Court of Canada

    Open Access•Roy B Flemming, Glen S Krutz et al.•Canadian Journal of Political…•2002

  • The 'Haves' and the 'Have Nots

    Russell Smyth•Australian Journal of Political…•2000

  • Explaining Litigant Success in the High Court of Australia

    Reginald S Sheehan, Kirk A Randazzo•Australian Journal of Political…•2012

  • "Voting for Women in the "Year of the Woman

    Kathleen Dolan•American Journal of Political…•1998

  • Gender Stereotypes and the Perception of Male and Female Candidates

    Leonie Huddy, Nayda Terkildsen•American Journal of Political…•1993

  • Gender Stereotypes and Vote Choice

    Kira Sanbonmatsu•American Journal of Political…•2002

  • Entering the Australian Judiciary

    Open Access•Kathy Mack, Sharyn Roach Anleu•Law & Policy•2012

  • Judicial Decisionmaking and the Use of Panels in the Canadian Supreme Court and the South African Appellate Division

    Open Access•Lori Hausegger, Stacia L Haynie et al.•Law & Society Review•2003

  • The Law as a Profession for Women

    Mary Jane Mossman•Australian Feminist Law Journal•2009

  • DoestheLawyer Matter? Influencing Outcomes on the Supreme Court of Canada

    Open Access•John Szmer, Susan W Johnson et al.•Law & Society Review•2007

  • Why the "Haves" Come Out Ahead

    Open Access•M Galanter•Law & Society Review•1974

  • Politics of the High Court

    Alan C Cairns, Brian Galligan•Pacific Affairs•1988

  • Selection Bias in Linear Regression, Logit and Probit Models

    Open Access•Jeffrey A Dubin, Douglas Rivers•Sociological Methods & Research•1989

Obras citantes distintas5
Citações por ano0,45
Intervalo de citações2015 - 2024 (10)
Velocidade de citaçãorecent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 4
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae