Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Judicial Decision Making In the Supreme Court of Canada

Updating the Personal Attribute Model

Dados Bibliográficos

ID6237801
AutoresDonald R Songer (University of South Carolina), Susan W Johnson (0000-0002-1899-4379, University of North Carolina at Greensboro)
Ano2007
Volume40
Fascículo4
Páginas911-934
Data de publicação2007-12-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoCanadian Journal of Political Science (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0008-4239 • E-ISSN: 1744-9324
EditoraCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0008423907071156
OpenAlexW2102281821
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas18
Referências citadas32

This study seeks to add to the current understanding of the political nature of the Supreme Court of Canada. We analyze a data set consisting of all nonunanimous published Supreme Court decisions for the period 1949 to 2000. A prior study by Tate and Sittiwong (1989) suggested a model of judge attributes for the period 1949 to 1985. We build on that analysis by extending the time period to 2000, which allows the impact of gender also to be assessed. We find that since the Court gained substantial docket control, the types of cases the Court hears has changed from the period studied by Tate and Sittiwong. In the more recent period, civil rights and liberties cases are much more substantial in number. We conclude some of the variables in the Tate and Sittiwong study may be time bound and we suggest a new model of attitudinal voting. Résumé. Cet étude cherche de augmenter le savoir courant du le nature politique du Cour suprême du Canada. Nous analysons un ensemble de données non unanime compose de tout décisions publié du Cour suprême entre les années 1949 à 1985. Une enquête précède fait par Tate et Sittiwong (1989) a proposé un modèle des attributs des juges pour la période entre 1949 à 1985. Nous poursuivons laquelle analyse pour prolonger la période du temps jusqu'à 2000, ce que on permettre évalue l'effet du sexe aussi. Nous trouvons que comme le Cour a conquis considérable control du registre, les gendres dossier entendre par le Cour ont changé depuis le période de enquête de Tate y Sittiwong. Pendent le période plus récent les dossiers concernant les droits civiles et libertés sont beaucoup plus nombreux. Nous concluons que possiblement, quelques variables de l'enquête du Tate et Sittiwong soient liées par le temp et nous proposent un modèle neuf des votes attitudinal

Civil liberties · Humanities · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Supreme court · Voting · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Legal and Constitutional Studies · Philosophy

  • The Supreme Court of Canada and Strategic Decision Making

    Susan W Johnson•The American Review of Canadian…•2012

  • The Politics of Judicial Retirement in Canada and the United Kingdom

    Open Access•Tajuana D Massie, Kirk A Randazzo et al.•Journal of Law and Courts•2014

  • Trailblazer women in the Supreme Court of Canada

    Susan W Johnson, Ali S Masood•Politics Groups and Identities•2021

  • Parliamentary Constraints on Constitutional Review in the Supreme Court of Canada

    Open Access•Brendan Dell, Paul J Gardner et al.•Canadian Journal of Political…•2026

  • Explaining Changes to Rights Litigation

    Raúl A Sánchez Urribarri, Raul A Sanchez-Urribarri et al.•The Journal of Politics•2011

  • O gênero da justiça e a problemática da efetivação dos direitos humanos das mulheres / The court of gender and the problem of effective human rights of women

    Open Access•Fabiana Cristina Severi•Revista Direito e Práxis•2016

  • Judge Gender, Critical Mass, and Decision Making in the Appellate Courts of Canada

    Susan W Johnson, Donald R Songer et al.•Women & Politics•2011

  • Quebec Justices as Quebec Representatives

    Robert Schertzer•Publius The Journal of Federalism•2016

  • The Impact of Racial Representation on Judicial Legitimacy

    Open Access•Susan Achury, Jason P Casellas et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2023

  • A cross-national analysis of the guarantees of rights

    Open Access•Udi Sommer, Victor Asal•International Political Science…•2014

  • Ideological Consistency and Attitudinal Conf lict

    Open Access•Matthew E Wetstein, C L Ostberg et al.•Comparative Political Studies•2009

  • The Unanimous Decisions of the Supreme Court of Canada as a Test of the Attitudinal Model

    Open Access•Donald R Songer, Julia Siripurapu•Canadian Journal of Political…•2009

  • Explaining Dissent on the Supreme Court of Canada

    Open Access•Donald R Songer, John Szmer et al.•Canadian Journal of Political…•2011

  • Strategic Legitimacy Cultivation at the Supreme Court of Canada

    Open Access•Vuk Radmilovic•Canadian Journal of Political…•2010

  • Back to the Future

    Open Access•J Lucas, Robert Vipond et al.•Canadian Journal of Political…•2017

  • Women Lawyers before the Supreme Court of Canada

    Open Access•Erin B Kaheny, John Szmer et al.•Canadian Journal of Political…•2011

  • You Can't Always Get What You Want

    Open Access•Emmett Macfarlane•Canadian Journal of Political…•2018

  • Latino Judges on the Federal District Court

    Open Access•Scott Hofer, Scott J Hofer et al.•American Politics Research•2020

  • Letting the People Decide

    Richard Johnston, André Blais et al.•Letting the People Decide•1992

  • The Judicial Mind Revisited

    Glendon Schubert•The Judicial Mind Revisited•1975

  • Comparative Analysis of Federal High Courts

    Open Access•André Bzdera•Canadian Journal of Political…•1993

  • Decision-Making in the Supreme Court

    Bertha Wilson•University of Toronto Law Journal•1986

  • The Roosevelt Court

    Open Access•Vincent M Barnett•Political Science Quarterly•1949

  • Reconciling the Solitudes

    David Frum, Charles Taylor•Foreign Affairs•1993

  • Personal Attribute Models of the Voting Behavior of U.S. Supreme Court Justices

    Open Access•C Neal Tate•American Political Science Review•1981

  • Decision Making in the Canadian Supreme Court

    C Neal Tate, Panu Sittiwong•The Journal of Politics•1989

  • A Reappraisal of Diversification in the Federal Courts

    Donald R Songer, Sue Davis et al.•The Journal of Politics•1994

  • The Diversification of the Federal Bench

    Thomas G Walker, Tom Walker et al.•The Journal of Politics•1985

  • Canadian Constraints on Judicialization from Without

    Open Access•Peter H Russell•International Political Science…•1994

  • Duverger's Law and the Meaning of Canadian Exceptionalism

    Open Access•Barry J Gaines, Brian J Gaines•Comparative Political Studies•1999

  • Dimensions of Attitudes Underlying Search and Seizure Decisions of the Supreme Court of Canada

    Open Access•C L Ostberg, Matthew E Wetstein et al.•Canadian Journal of Political…•1998

  • The Charter in the Supreme Court of Canada

    Open Access•Andrew Heard, Andrew D Heard•Canadian Journal of Political…•1991

  • Can the Canadians Be a Sovereign People

    Open Access•Peter H Russell•Canadian Journal of Political…•1991

  • Consensus on the United States Courts of Appeals

    Burton M Atkins, Justin J Green•American Journal of Political…•1976

  • Time Binding and Theory Building in Personal Attribute Models of Supreme Court Voting Behavior, 1916-88

    C Neal Tate, Roger Handberg•American Journal of Political…•1991

  • Social Background as an Indicator to the Votes of Supreme Court Justices in Criminal Cases

    Sidney Ulmer, S Sidney Ulmer•American Journal of Political…•1973

  • Do Frozen Cleavages Ever Go Stale? The Bases of the Canadian and Australian Party Systems

    Open Access•William Irvine, William P Irvine et al.•British Journal of Political…•1980

  • Do Bills of Rights Matter? The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms

    Open Access•Charles R Epp•American Political Science Review•1996

  • Are Social Background Models Time-Bound

    Open Access•Sidney Ulmer, S Sidney Ulmer•American Political Science Review•1986

  • Voting Behavior on the United States Courts of Appeals Revisited

    Open Access•Sheldon Goldman•American Political Science Review•1975

  • Reconciling the Solitudes

    Charles Taylor, Guy Laforest•Reconciling the Solitudes•1993

Obras citantes distintas18
Citações por ano1,06
Intervalo de citações2009 - 2026 (18)
Velocidade de citaçãocurrent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 18
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae