Collective learning and regime dynamics under uncertainty
Labour reform and the way to autocracy in Russia
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 6254203 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Ivan S Grigoriev (0000-0002-0058-8583, National Research University Higher School of Economics), Anna A Dekalchuk (0000-0003-2032-3205, National Research University Higher School of Economics) |
| Ano | 2016 |
| Páginas | 1-17 |
| Data de publicação | 2016-09-01 |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Democratization (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1351-0347 • E-ISSN: 1743-890X |
| Editora | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/13510347.2016.1223629 |
| OpenAlex | W2517850212 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 4 |
| Referências citadas | 33 |
The article questions the structural approach to autocratic transition that sees government as knowingly and purposely building autocracy, and contributes to the tradition emphasizing the plurality of possible regime developments and the role of contingency therein, by providing a more systematic treatment of such contingency. We offer a path-dependent theory of political change and use insights from cognitive institutionalism to show how ad hoc policy reform practices become accepted as a trusted way of interaction by political actors and how they "learn" their way into autocracy. This intuition is substantiated with a case-study of the labour reform in Putin's Russia. The early 2000s marked a surge in uncertainty in Russian politics caused by the succession crisis and the profound political turnover it triggered. This uncertainty could have resolved in a number of ways, each leading to a different political development. We trace the actual way out of this uncertainty and show that the major factor to condition further regime trajectory was the way social reforms were conducted. The course of these reforms determined the ruling coalition and the institutions that ensure credible commitment within its ranks (the dominant party), and contributed to crowding out the political market and opposition decay
Autocracy · Contingency · Democracy · Economic system · Economics · Law and economics · Opposition (politics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Regime change · Sociology · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Political Conflict and Governance · Social Policy and Reform Studies
State Building in Putin’s Russia
Reevaluating the modernization hypothesis
Intransitivities in multidimensional voting models and some implications for agenda control
An economic theory of democracy
Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy
Democracy Derailed in Russia
Competitive Authoritarianism
Authoritarian Learning and Authoritarian Resilience
Second Europe-Asia Lecture
The Regional Roots of Electoral Authoritarianism in Russia
Putin's Challenge
The Russian Economic Crisis and the Future of Russian Economic Reform
Uncertainty in the Transition
No more colour! Authoritarian regimes and colour revolutions in Eurasia
Diffusion-Proofing
Authoritarian Russia
Adaptive Informal Institutions and Endogenous Institutional Change in China
Complex Causal Relations and Case Study Methods
Learning, Institutions, and Economic Performance
Presidential Support in the Russian State Duma
Elections Without Democracy
Political Survival and Endogenous Institutional Change
Credible Power-Sharing and the Longevity of Authoritarian Rule
Parchment, Equilibria, and Institutions
Qualitative Research
Institutional Arrangements and Equilibrium in Multidimensional Voting Models
Negotiating Welfare in Postcommunist States
Authoritarian State Building and the Sources of Regime Competitiveness in the Fourth Wave
Spontaneous Order
Implications from the Disequilibrium of Majority Rule for the Study of Institutions
| Citações por ano | 1 |
|---|---|
| Intervalo de citações | 2022 - 2025 (4) |
| Altamente citado | Não |