De-Centering, Not Discarding, the “Isms”

Some Friendly Amendments

Dados Bibliográficos

ID6272811
AutoresRounak Sil (0000-0001-9502-3122, University of Pennsylvania), Rudra Sil, Peter J Katzenstein (Cornell University)
Ano2011
Volume55
Fascículo2
Páginas481-485
Data de publicação2011-06-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoInternational Studies Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0020-8833 • E-ISSN: 1468-2478
EditoraOxford University Press (OUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1111/j.1468-2478.2011.00657.x
OpenAlexW1873800284
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas17
Referências citadas9

The authors are sympathetic to much of David Lake's argument in his critique of paradigmatic 'isms' in the field. However, they also seek to qualify his diagnosis of the problem and critically assess some of his prescriptions and his efforts to manage epistemological divides in the field. In the process, the authors also clarify certain aspects of 'analytic eclecticism

Argument (complex analysis · Eclecticism · Epistemology · Field (mathematics · Process (computing · Sociology · Computer Science · Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice · Critical Realism in Sociology · Management and Organizational Studies · Mathematics · Medicine · Philosophy