Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Do Citizens’ Preferences Matter? Shaping Legislator Attitudes Towards Peace Agreements

Dados Bibliográficos

ID6284125
AutoresMiguel García-Sánchez (0000-0002-7880-7280, Department of Political Science, and Global Studies Universidad de Los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia), Aila M Matanock (0000-0002-2472-2644, Department of Political Science, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA), Natalia Garbiras-Díaz (0000-0001-6584-1167, Max Weber Programme, European University Institute, Italy, autor correspondente)
Ano2023
Volume67
Fascículo5
Páginas893-922
Data de publicação2023-05-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoJournal of Conflict Resolution (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0022-0027 • E-ISSN: 1552-8766
EditoraSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/00220027221099245
OpenAlexW4281566250
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas6
Referências citadas26

To what extent are legislators, responsible for the implementation of many peace agreements, responsive to citizens’ preferences? Examining the 2016 Colombian peace agreement, we embed an experiment in the 2019 wave of a survey of all the members of Congress. We inform legislators about the attitudes of the general population and residents of conflict-affected regions on a provision included in the peace agreement: the creation of 16 special seats in the House of Representatives reserved for conflict areas. We find that legislators underestimate citizen support for this policy, and the magnitude of their misconception is correlated with the positions of their parties on the issue. Moreover, we find that providing information about citizens’ support for the policy does not affect legislator support for the provision

Affect (linguistics · Legislation · Legislator · Political science · Population · Public relations · Sociology · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Politics and Society in Latin America · Public Administration

  • Digital peacebuilding in post‐conflict Colombia – A conceptual framework

    Open Access•Tate Ryan‐Mosley•Global Policy•2024

  • Who's Afraid of Policy Experiments

    Open Access•Robert Dur, Arjan Non et al.•The Economic Journal•2024

  • Does citizen participation promote peace agreement implementation? Evidence from Colombia

    Open Access•Theresa Bachmann•Cooperation and Conflict•2025

  • Who Supports the Peace? A Survey of Postconflict Public Opinion in Maguindanao, the Philippines

    Open Access•Tatsuya Koyama•Journal of Current Southeast…•2025

  • Citizens and Peace Mediations in Divided Societies

    Open Access•Neophytos Loizides, C Psaltis et al.•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2022

  • Introducing the Mapping Attitudes, Perceptions and Support (Maps) dataset on the Colombian peace process

    Open Access•Michael Weintraub, Abbey Steele et al.•Journal of Peace Research•2024

  • Mandates and Democracy

    Open Access•C Stoke, Susan C Stokes•Mandates and Democracy•2001

  • Reconsidering the Rational Public

    Open Access•James H Kuklinski, Paul J Quirk•Elements of Reason•2000

  • Candidate Positioning in U.S. House Elections

    Stephen Ansolabehere, Jane Mcintosh Snyder et al.•American Journal of Political…•2001

  • Does Counterinsurgent Success Match Social Support? Evidence from a Survey Experiment in Colombia

    Aila M Matanock, Miguel García-Sánchez•The Journal of Politics•2018

  • Self-Fulfilling Misperceptions of Public Polarization

    Douglas J Ahler•The Journal of Politics•2014

  • Inequality and Democratic Responsiveness

    Martin Gilens•Public Opinion Quarterly•2005

  • Political Parties, Motivated Reasoning, and Public Opinion Formation

    Open Access•Thomas J Leeper, Rune Slothuus•Political Psychology•2014

  • The Influence of Partisan Motivated Reasoning on Public Opinion

    Open Access•Toby Bolsen, James N Druckman et al.•Political Behavior•2014

  • The Job of Representation in Congress

    Open Access•J Tobin Grant, Thomas J Rudolph et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2004

  • Are the Policy Preferences of Relatively Poor Citizens Under-represented in the Swiss Parliament

    Jan Rosset•Journal of Legislative Studies•2013

  • Delegative Democracy

    Open Access•Guillermo A O''Donell, Guillermo A O'Donell•Journal of democracy•1994

  • Why are the affluent better represented around the world

    Open Access•Noam Lupu, Zach Warner•European Journal of Political…•2022

  • Political Representation in Latin America

    Open Access•Juan Pablo Luna, Elizabeth J Zechmeister•Comparative Political Studies•2005

  • Veto Players and Civil War Duration

    Open Access•David E Cunningham, David Cunningham•American Journal of Political…•2006

  • Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs

    Open Access•Charles S Taber, Milton Lodge•American Journal of Political…•2006

  • The Role of Evidence in Politics

    Open Access•Martin Baekgaard, Julian Christensen et al.•British Journal of Political…•2019

  • The transsituational influence of social norms

    Raymond R Reno, Robert B Cialdini et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1993

  • Conflict among Former Allies after Civil War Settlement

    Open Access•Pierre M Atlas, Roy Licklider•Journal of Peace Research•1999

  • Political Ignorance and Collective Policy Preferences

    Open Access•Martin Gilens•American Political Science Review•2001

  • Dynamic Representation

    Open Access•James A Stimson, James Stimson et al.•American Political Science Review•1995

Obras citantes distintas6
Citações por ano1,5
Intervalo de citações2022 - 2025 (4)
Velocidade de citaçãorecent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 6
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae