Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

At Home and Abroad

The Use of Denial-of-service Attacks during Elections in Nondemocratic Regimes

Dados Bibliográficos

ID6284584
AutoresPhilipp M Lutscher (0000-0001-6176-7297, University of Konstanz), Nils B Weidmann (0000-0002-4791-4913, University of Konstanz, autor correspondente), Miguel E Roberts (0000-0001-6900-4366, University of California San Diego), Margaret E Roberts (Department of Political Science, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA), Mattijs Jonker (0000-0001-5174-9140, University of Twente), Alistair King (Center for Applied Internet Data Analysis, San Diego Supercomputer Center, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA), Alberto Dainotti (0000-0001-6444-5656, Center for Applied Internet Data Analysis, San Diego Supercomputer Center, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA)
Ano2020
Volume64
Fascículo2-3
Páginas373-401
Data de publicação2020-02-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoJournal of Conflict Resolution (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0022-0027 • E-ISSN: 1552-8766
EditoraSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0022002719861676
OpenAlexW2964277065
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas17
Referências citadas45

In this article, we study the political use of denial-of-service (DoS) attacks, a particular form of cyberattack that disables web services by flooding them with high levels of data traffic. We argue that websites in nondemocratic regimes should be especially prone to this type of attack, particularly around political focal points such as elections. This is due to two mechanisms: governments employ DoS attacks to censor regime-threatening information, while at the same time, activists use DoS attacks as a tool to publicly undermine the government’s authority. We analyze these mechanisms by relying on measurements of DoS attacks based on large-scale Internet traffic data. Our results show that in authoritarian countries, elections indeed increase the number of DoS attacks. However, these attacks do not seem to be directed primarily against the country itself but rather against other states that serve as hosts for news websites from this country

Authoritarianism · Business · Computer security · Democracy · Denial · Denial-of-service attack · Flooding (psychology · Government (linguistics · Internet privacy · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · The Internet · Computer Science · Internet Traffic Analysis and Secure E-voting · Law · Network Security and Intrusion Detection · Psychology · Spam and Phishing Detection

  • The digital repression of social movements, protest, and activism

    Open Access•Jennifer Earl, Thomas V Maher et al.•Science Advances•2022

  • Spatiotemporal characteristics and drivers of global cyber conflicts

    Open Access•Jiping Dong, Shuai Chen et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2025

  • Macht im Cyberspace

    Open Access•Kerstin Zettl-Schabath•Zeitschrift für Friedens- und…•2022

  • Factors that influence a country to exercise its capacity for digital repression

    Open Access•Georgiana Clarke, Donavon Johnson•Journal of Information Technology…•2026

  • Repression in the Digital Age

    Anita R Gohdes, Anita Gohdes•Repression in the Digital Age•2023

  • How Dictators Control the Internet

    Open Access•Eda Keremoğlu, Nils B Weidmann•Comparative Political Studies•2020

  • State disinformation

    Open Access•Juan Luis Manfredi-Sánchez, Adriana Amado et al.•Communication & Society•2022

  • Digital Retaliation? Denial-of-Service Attacks after Sanction Events

    Open Access•Philipp M Lutscher•Journal of Global Security Studies•2021

  • Attack or Block? Repertoires of Digital Censorship in Autocracies

    Lukas Kawerau, Nils B Weidmann et al.•Journal of Information Technology…•2022

  • The rise of authoritarian informationalism

    Lisa Garbe, Seraphine F Maerz•Democratization•2026

  • Hot topics

    Open Access•Philipp M Lutscher•Political Science Research and…•2023

  • How practices of digital authoritarianism harm democracy

    Open Access•Seraphine F Maerz•Democratization•2025

  • Collaborative authoritarianism and its unintended consequences

    Open Access•Bruno Schmidt-Feuerheerd•Democratization•2024

  • State of the world 2021

    Open Access•Vanessa A Boese, Martin Lundstedt et al.•Democratization•2022

  • Online repression and tactical evasion

    Open Access•Philipp M Lutscher, Neil Ketchley•Democratization•2023

  • Legalizing control

    Open Access•Maurice Phillip Schumann•Democratization•2025

  • Why Botter

    Open Access•Denis Stukal, Sergey Sanovich et al.•American Political Science Review•2022

  • Access Denied

    Open Access•Ronald Deibert, John Palfrey et al.•Access Denied•2008

  • The Impact of Media Censorship

    Yuyu Chen, David Y Yang•American Economic Review•2019

  • Título indisponível

    Open Access•null null•Philosophy study•2016

  • Internet and Social Movement Action Repertoires

    Jeroen Van Laer, Peter Van Aelst•Information Communication & Society•2010

  • Networked Authoritarianism and Social Media in Azerbaijan

    Open Access•K E Pearce, Sarah Kendzior•Journal of Communication•2012

  • Democratization by Elections

    Staffan Lindberg, Staffan I Lindberg•Democratization by election•2009

  • Muslim Democratic Parties in the Middle East

    A Kadir Yildirim•Muslim Democratic Parties in the…•2016

  • The Politics of Uncertainty

    Andreas Schedler•The Politics Of Uncertainty…•2013

  • Regimes of the World (RoW)

    Open Access•Anna Lührmann, Marcus Tannenberg et al.•Politics and Governance•2018

  • Repression, Education, and Politically Motivated Cyberattacks

    Victor Asal, Jacob A Mauslein et al.•Journal of Global Security Studies•2016

  • Elections, Fraud, and Election Monitoring in the Shadow of Revolution

    Andrew T Little•Quarterly Journal of Political…•2012

  • Liberation vs. Control

    Open Access•Ronald J Deibert, Ronald Deibert et al.•Journal of democracy•2010

  • Cyclones in cyberspace

    Open Access•Ronald J Deibert, Rafal Rohozinski et al.•Security Dialogue•2012

  • Reconstructing the correlates of war dataset on material capabilities of states, 1816–1985

    Judith D Singer•International Interactions•1988

  • The Geography of the International System

    Open Access•Nils B Weidmann, Doreen Kuse et al.•International Interactions•2010

  • To Lag or Not to Lag

    Open Access•Arjun S Wilkins, Arjun Wilkins•Political Science Research and…•2018

  • Autocratic Elections

    Open Access•Carl Henrik Knutsen, Håvard Mokleiv Nygård et al.•World Politics•2017

  • Communication Technology and Protest

    Andrew T Little•The Journal of Politics•2016

  • Media Disruption and Revolutionary Unrest

    Navid Hassanpour•Political Communication•2014

  • Enough! Electoral Fraud, Collective Action Problems, and Post-Communist Colored Revolutions

    Joshua A Tucker•Perspectives on Politics•2007

  • E-Bandits in Global Activism

    Open Access•Wendy H Wong, Peter A Brown•Perspectives on Politics•2013

  • Corrupting the Cyber-Commons

    Open Access•Seva Gunitsky•Perspectives on Politics•2015

  • Electoral authoritarianism and political unrest

    Open Access•Ryan Shirah•International Political Science…•2016

  • From Liberation to Turmoil

    Open Access•Joshua A Tucker, Yannis Theocharis et al.•Journal of democracy•2017

  • Liberation Technology

    Open Access•L Diamond•Journal of democracy•2010

  • Invisible Digital Front

    Open Access•Nadiya Kostyuk, Yuri M Zhukov•Journal of Conflict Resolution•2019

  • Credible Power-Sharing and the Longevity of Authoritarian Rule

    Open Access•Beatriz Magaloni•Comparative Political Studies•2008

  • Masses, Crowds, Communities, Movements

    Ulrich Dolata, Jan-Felix Schrape•Social movement studies•2016

  • Elections Under Authoritarianism

    Jill Gandhi, Ellen Lust-Okar et al.•Annual Review of Political Science•2009

  • Introducing the UCDP Georeferenced Event Dataset

    Open Access•Ralph Sundberg, Erik Melander•Journal of Peace Research•2013

  • The dynamics of cyber conflict between rival antagonists, 2001-11

    Open Access•Brandon Valeriano, Ryan C Mane et al.•Journal of Peace Research•2014

  • How Censorship in China Allows Government Criticism but Silences Collective Expression

    Open Access•Gary King, Jennifer Pan et al.•American Political Science Review•2013

  • How Sudden Censorship Can Increase Access to Information

    Open Access•William R Hobbs, William Hobbs et al.•American Political Science Review•2018

  • How the Chinese Government Fabricates Social Media Posts for Strategic Distraction, Not Engaged Argument

    Open Access•Gary King, Jennifer Pan et al.•American Political Science Review•2017

  • The Use of Newspaper Data in the Study of Collective Action

    Jennifer Earl, Andrew Martins et al.•Annual Review of Sociology•2004

  • Exploring the Correlates of Individual Willingness to Engage in Ideologically Motivated Cyberattacks

    Thomas J Holt, Max Kilger et al.•Deviant Behavior•2017

Obras citantes distintas17
Citações por ano2,83
Intervalo de citações2020 - 2026 (7)
Velocidade de citaçãocurrent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 17
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae