Do Shocks Change Organizations? The Case of Nasa

The 50-year history of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration's (NASA) spaceflight program is marked by spectacular accomplishments and devastating tragedy. NASA has suffered three major disasters, each of which destroyed a spacecraft and killed its crew. In the wake of each accident, investigators and analysts identified causes and recommended technical and organizational improvements that NASA should undertake. The NASA case presents an opportunity to examine the question: Do shocks change organizations? The article reviews three prominent theoretical models of organizational change. Then, using data derived from 5 years of participant observation, as well as government reports, academic investigations, and news articles, we present an analysis of whether the factors required for change identified in the literature were and are present at NASA. The results of this examination suggest that in the wake of these shocks, the agency undertook many technical and procedural changes, but that, as the literature predicts, there are also barriers embedded in the fabric of the agency that are likely to thwart change. We conclude by examining the prospects for understanding change in public, private, and nonprofit organizations of all sizes that experience shocks and offer propositions for future research

Administration (probate law · Aeronautics · Agency (philosophy · Crew · Government (linguistics · Organizational change · Political science · Public relations · Social science · Sociology · Spaceflight · Tragedy (event · Engineering · Management and Organizational Studies · Public Relations and Crisis Communication · Risk Perception and Management · Law

• Managing Uncertainty in Crisis

  Open Access•Xiaoli Lu•Managing Uncertainty in Crisis•2017

  Incluir item

• Making Space

  Open Access•Jeremy L Hall•Public Works Management & Policy•2026

  Incluir item

• Renegotiating property rights in the Florida golden crab fishery

  Open Access•Scott Crosson, Tracy Yandle et al.•International Journal of the…•2013

  Incluir item

• Resilience Thinking

  Open Access•Andreas Duit•Public Administration•2015

  Incluir item

• Meet all changes with constancy

  Open Access•Changkun Cai, Qiyao Shen et al.•Public Administration•2022

  Incluir item

• Covid ‐19‐induced governance transformation

  Open Access•Tina Øllgaard Bentzen, Tina Ø Bentzen et al.•Public Administration•2022

  Incluir item

• Rebel with a cause

  Open Access•Bernard Bernards, Eduard Schmidt et al.•Public Administration•2023

  Incluir item

• Innovation and inter-organizational learning in the context of public service reform

  Open Access•Jean Hartley, Lyndsay Rashman•International Review of…•2018

  Incluir item

• Organization change failure, deep structures and temporality

  Open Access•Loizos Heracleous, Jean M Bartunek et al.•Human Relations•2021

  Incluir item

• Embedded Government Control and Nonprofit Revenue Growth

  Open Access•Na Ni, Xueyong Zhan•Public Administration Review•2017

  Incluir item

• Organizational Dissolutions in the Public Sector

  Open Access•Temirlan T Moldogaziev, Tima T Moldogaziev et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2019

  Incluir item

• Mixed Methods in Public Administration Research

  Open Access•Valentina Mele, Paolo Belardinelli•Journal of Public Administration…•2019

  Incluir item

• Policy Alienation and Street-level Bureaucrats’ Psychological Wellbeing

  Open Access•Muhammad Usman, Moazzam Ali et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2021

  Incluir item

• Some Characteristics of One Type of High Reliability Organization

  Karlene H Roberts•Organization Science•1990

  Incluir item

• Defining the 'field at a given time.'

  K Lewin•Psychological Review•1943

  Incluir item

• A behavioral theory of the firm

  Richard M Cyert•A behavioral theory of the firm•1963

  Incluir item

• Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes

  Robert M Emerson, Rachel I Fretz et al.•Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes•1995

  Incluir item

• The Social Shaping of Commission Reports

  Open Access•Diane Vaughan•Sociological Forum•2006

  Incluir item

• Whither Challenger, Wither Columbia

  Open Access•Terence M Garrett•The American Review of Public…•2004

  Incluir item

• Assessing Nasa’s Safety Culture

  Open Access•Arjen Boin, Paul R Schulman et al.•Public Administration Review•2008

  Incluir item

• Learning when and how to lie

  Open Access•Edgar H Schein•Human Relations•2004

  Incluir item

• The Causal Texture of Organizational Environments

  Open Access•F E Emery, E L Trist•Human Relations•1965

  Incluir item

• The practice of social research

  Earl R Babbie•The practice of social research•2010

  Incluir item

• Accountability in the Public Sector

  Barbara S Romzek, Melvin J Dubnick•Public Administration Review•1987

  Incluir item

• Managing Successful Organizational Change in the Public Sector

  Open Access•Sergio Fernandez, Hal G Rainey•Public Administration Review•2006

  Incluir item

• Working in Practice But Not in Theory

  Todd R Laporte, Paula M Consolini•Journal of Public Administration…•1991

  Incluir item

• Samuel Phillips and the Taming of Apollo

  Stephen B Johnson•Technology and Culture•2001

  Incluir item