Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Parliamentarians’ perspectives on parenthood and politics in Canada’s House of Commons

Dados Bibliográficos

ID6314036
AutoresSusan Franceschet (0000-0002-5311-308X, Political Science, University of Calgary , 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary T2N1N4), Erica Rayment (0000-0002-5729-9715, Political Science, University of Calgary , 2500 University Drive NW, Calgary T2N1N4)
Ano2025
Volume79
Fascículo2
Páginas440-460
Data de publicação2025-08-04
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoParliamentary Affairs (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0031-2290 • E-ISSN: 1460-2482
EditoraOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/pa/gsaf037
OpenAlexW4412929343
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas2
Referências citadas18

Canada’s members of parliament (MPs) work long hours, travel frequently, and spend weeks away from home each year. Research on gender and politics finds that parliamentary work is not designed to accommodate those with caring obligations, usually women. In this paper, we leverage a survey of sitting Canadian MPs conducted in 2022 to assess whether women MPs report greater difficulty combining a political career with family life and to identify patterns of MP support for parenthood accommodations in parliament. Drawing on responses to closed- and open-ended questions, we argue that women MPs experience the challenge of reconciling work and family more acutely than do men MPs. When it comes to support for family-friendly policies in parliament, however, we find that party is more strongly correlated with MPs’ attitudes than gender. Most respondents are supportive of accommodating parenthood, but resistance appears among Conservative MPs, particularly for accommodations affecting core parliamentary operations

Commons · House of Commons · Parliament · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Gender Politics and Representation · Gender Studies · Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics · Law · Social Policy and Reform Studies

  • How can we improve gender balance in local government? Family-friendly policies and static ambition in England

    Open Access•L Timlin, Ana Catalano Weeks et al.•Journal of European Public Policy•2026

  • Parties, Gender, and Attitudes Toward Parenthood and Politics in Germany

    Open Access•Susan Franceschet, Christina Xydias•Politics & Gender•2026

  • Beyond Rhetoric

    Open Access•Elena Frech, Sophie Kopsch•Politics and Governance•2024

  • Gender, family status, and parliamentary careers in the German Bundestag

    Susan Franceschet, Malliga Och et al.•Politics Groups and Identities•2024

  • Constructing the “Good Mother”

    Open Access•Deirdre D Johnston, Debra H Swanson•Sex Roles•2006

  • Parents in Parliament

    Open Access•Rosie Campbell, Sarah Childs•The Political Quarterly•2014

  • Child Penalties in Politics

    Open Access•Jon H Fiva, Max-Emil M King•The Economic Journal•2024

  • Time Spent in the House

    Open Access•Jeffrey Lazarus, Amy Steigerwalt et al.•Politics & Gender•2022

  • The Electoral Consequences of Marriage and Motherhood

    Melissa A Bell, Karen M Kaufmann•Women & Politics•2015

  • Understanding Legislator Experiences of Family-Friendly Working Practices in Political Institutions

    Open Access•Peter Allen, David Cutts et al.•Politics & Gender•2016

  • Gender and Political Seniority

    Open Access•Ragnhild Louise Muriaas, Torill Stavenes•Politics & Gender•2024

  • More Feminists or More Women

    Open Access•Manon Tremblay, Réjean Pelletier•International Political Science…•2000

  • When the House is Not a Home

    Open Access•Rachael Johnstone•Canadian Journal of Political…•2024

  • Experiments and Surveys on Political Elites

    Open Access•Joshua D Kertzer, Jonathan Renshon•Annual Review of Political Science•2022

  • Can(‘t) have it all? Parents in the Swiss Parliament

    Open Access•Elena Frech, Stefanie Bailer et al.•Swiss Political Science Review•2024

  • The Wage Penalty for Motherhood

    Michelle J Budig, P England•American Sociological Review•2001

  • The Production of Inequality

    Open Access•J E Yavorsky, Claire M Kamp Dush et al.•Journal of Marriage and the Family•2015

Obras citantes distintas2
Citações por ano2
Intervalo de citações2026 - 2026 (1)
Velocidade de citaçãocurrent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 2
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae