Is It Gender, Religiosity or Both? A Role Congruity Theory of Candidate Electability in Transitional Tunisia

Dados Bibliográficos

ID6317439
AutoresLindsay J Benstead (0000-0003-2459-5857, Portland State University), Amaney A Jamal (0000-0002-9969-3120), Amaney Jamal (0000-0002-0895-5472, Princeton University), Ellen Lust (0000-0001-9436-462X, Yale University)
Ano2015
Volume13
Fascículo1
Páginas74-94
Data de publicação2015-03-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoPerspectives on Politics (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1537-5927 • E-ISSN: 1541-0986
EditoraCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s1537592714003144
OpenAlexW2132775566
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas50
Referências citadas65

Do voters regard male and female candidates equally? Does apparent religiosity of candidates help or hurt their electoral chances? Where biases exist, what explains them? We present a novel explanation of political bias, drawing from role congruity theory. It posits that political contexts shape citizens' perceptions of qualities that make a “capable leader,” which subsequently drives their willingness to vote for candidates. Evidence from a survey experiment embedded in the 2012 Tunisian Post-Election Survey demonstrates that this theory explains biases based on gender and religiosity better than dominant modernization and social identity theories. Moreover, these mechanisms are also likely to drive political biases related to other features and in other countries. This has important implications for policymakers aiming to reduce political biases in Tunisia, the MENA, or globally. It should encourage them to pay careful attention to stereotyped traits of underrepresented groups and successful leaders, and to use institutional solutions (e.g., electoral quotas) to shape expectations about underrepresented groups and leadership

Economics · Identity (music · Modernization theory · Perception · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Religiosity · Social group · Social identity theory · Survey data collection · World Values Survey · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Gender Diversity and Inequality · Gender Politics and Representation · Psychology · Social Psychology