Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

The performance of accountability and the treatment of experts by politicians

UK parliamentary select committees during the Covid-19 pandemic

Dados Bibliográficos

ID6327397
AutoresFelicity Matthews (0000-0002-3248-5386), Matthew Wood (0000-0002-0433-2972, University of Sheffield)
Ano2025
Páginas1-23
Data de publicação2025-09-12
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoPolicy & Politics (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0305-5736 • E-ISSN: 1470-8442
EditoraBristol University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1332/03055736y2025d000000080
OpenAlexW4414593827
IdiomaEN
Referências citadas17

While recent research on policy making and implementation has shifted analytical attention from formal to informal or voluntary accountability processes, there remains a lack of systematic attention to the individual-level dynamics of accountability. Similarly, existing research has largely overlooked the intra-institutional dynamics of the accountability ‘forum’ and the diverse and often politicised ways that accountability processes are deployed. Responding to these gaps, this article brings together hitherto separate strands of literature regarding political performance, democratic representation and accountability discourses to examine how politicians enact their accountabilities and the factors that shape their performance, particularly under conditions of heightened politicisation. Empirical evidence is provided by an analysis of legislative committees, specifically the select committees of the UK’s national parliament; and it presents the findings of original research that draws on a unique data set of 2,815 questions posed to expert witnesses by select committees during the COVID-19 pandemic. Despite concerns about the prevalence of populist pressures during heightened politicisation, we show that politicians rarely engaged in politicised blame games or partisan grandstanding, offering a positive rejoinder to concerns about the denigration of experts. Instead, we suggest that politicians regard experts as valuable actors in accountability processes, engaging with their expertise and evidence in relevant ways, even when under political pressure. By understanding the act of accountability as part of the political performance, and expression of what it means to be a political representative, this research offers a fresh analytical perspective on the dynamics of the accountability of experts in policy making

Nonprofit Sector and Volunteering · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Public Policy and Administration Research

  • The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (Paper))

    Richard D Lambert•The Annals of the American…•2001

  • The Political Uses of Expert Knowledge

    Open Access•Christina Boswell•Political Uses of Expert Knowledge•2009

  • The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability

    M A P Bovens, Mark Bovens et al.•The Oxford handbook of public…•2014

  • The global rise of populism

    Fatmanur Kaçar•Global Affairs•2017

  • Contemporary Political Theory

    Open Access•Ankush B Sawant•India Quarterly A Journal of…•1989

  • Legislation at Westminster

    Open Access•Olivier Rozenberg•Public Administration•2018

  • Parliamentary Socialisation

    Emma Crewe•Journal of Legislative Studies•2012

Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae