The Effects of Beneficiary Targeting on Public Support for Social Policies

We assess the tendency for the public to use group‐centric policy evaluations with evidence from a survey experiment concerning two issues within the social policy domain, health care and aid to cities. By randomly varying target group identity within each issue and using both negatively and positively regarded groups our evidence shows that differences exist in the tendency for members of the public to use group‐centric heuristics. Group‐centric evaluations are related to party identification and political ideology. Across both issues conservatives and Republicans are more likely than liberals or Democrats to adopt a group‐centric heuristic. Partisan and ideological differences suggest that established theories miss the mark by emphasizing how universal policy designs are preferred to designs that target unpopular groups

Beneficiary · Economics · Heuristics · Identification (biology · Identity (music · Ideology · Political science · Politics · Public domain · Public economics · Public policy · Public relations · Social group · Social identity theory · Computer Science · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Law · Policy Transfer and Learning · Psychology · Public Administration · Public Policy and Administration Research · Social Psychology

• The Education Policy of Free Senior High School in Ghana

  Angela Bonsu, Alhassan Sayibu Suhuyini et al.•International Journal of Public…•2026

  Incluir item

• Survey Experiments in Public Policy

  Open Access•Radek Kovács, Arnošt Veselý•Review of Policy Research•2025

  Incluir item

• Representative Bureaucracy Buffering Adverse Policy Climates

  Open Access•Jiaqi Liang, Sanghee Park et al.•Governance•2025

  Incluir item

• Moral Intuitions and Smart Growth

  Paula Gilbert Lewis•Journal of Urban Affairs•2014

  Incluir item

• Policy design and public support for carbon tax

  Open Access•Nives Dolšak, Christopher Adolph et al.•Public Administration•2020

  Incluir item

• Rank-order implications of social construction theory

  Open Access•Sumaia A Al‐kohlani, Sumaia A Al-Kohlani et al.•Policy Sciences•2016

  Incluir item

• The Politics of Designing Tuition-Free College

  Elizabeth Bell•The Journal of Higher Education•2020

  Incluir item

• Integrating identity in policy design theory

  Elizabeth Bell, Edith Lui•Policy & Politics•2023

  Incluir item

• Think of the Children

  Open Access•Saied Toossi•Public Opinion Quarterly•2022

  Incluir item

• Just or Unjust? How Ideological Beliefs Shape Street‐Level Bureaucrats’ Perceptions of Administrative Burden

  Open Access•Elizabeth Bell, Ani Ter‐mkrtchyan et al.•Public Administration Review•2020

  Incluir item

• The role of target populations in resident support for local collaboration

  Open Access•Vaiva Kalesnikaite, Milena I Neshkova et al.•Public Administration Review•2024

  Incluir item

• The Interplay of Empathy and Individualism in Support for Social Welfare Policies

  Open Access•Stanley Feldman, Leonie Huddy et al.•Political Psychology•2020

  Incluir item

• Policy design receptivity and target populations

  Open Access•Chris Koski, Paul Manson•Policy Studies Journal•2024

  Incluir item

• Deserving to Whom? Investigating Heterogeneity in the Impact of Social Constructions of Target Populations on Support for Affirmative Action

  Open Access•Elizabeth Bell•Policy Studies Journal•2021

  Incluir item

• Who Deserves Scarce Health and Education Resources? How Policy Context Shapes Target Group Deservingness

  Open Access•Elizabeth Bell, Monica C Schneider et al.•Policy Studies Journal•2025

  Incluir item

• Gender equality frames do not impact public support for economic relief policy in times of crisis

  Open Access•Lisa Asticher, Fritz Sager•Review of Policy Research•2025

  Incluir item

• Framing Effects, Social Norm Perception, and Tolerance of Lesbian and Gay Individuals

  Andrej Findor, Matej Hruška et al.•Journal of Homosexuality•2023

  Incluir item

• Equality, Reciprocity, or Need? Bolstering Welfare Policy Support for Marginalized Groups with Distributive Fairness

  Open Access•Andrej Findor, Matej Hruška et al.•American Political Science Review•2023

  Incluir item

• Public Support for Sickle-Cell Disease Funding

  Open Access•Shawn M Bediako, Tyson King-Meadows•Race and Social Problems•2016

  Incluir item

• Why Americans Hate Welfare

  Martin Gilens•Why Americans hate welfare•1999

  Incluir item

• Party Ideologies in America, 1828–1996

  Open Access•John Gerring•Party Ideologies in America,…•1998

  Incluir item

• Mostly Harmless Econometrics

  Jorn‐steffen Pischke, Jörn-Steffen Pischke et al.•Mostly Harmless Econometrics•2009

  Incluir item

• The 2006 Cooperative Congressional Election Study

  Lynn Vavreck, Douglas Rivers•Journal of Elections Public…•2008

  Incluir item

• The Political Culture of Ambivalence

  Stanley Feldman, John Zaller•American Journal of Political…•1992

  Incluir item

• Issue Frames and Group-Centrism in American Public Opinion

  Thomas E Nelson, Donald R Kinder•The Journal of Politics•1996

  Incluir item

• The Polls

  Robert Y Shapiro, John Young et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•1986

  Incluir item

• Reaching Beyond Race

  Open Access•Paul M Sniderman, E G Carmines•PS Political Science & Politics•1997

  Incluir item

• Public Opinion and the Welfare State

  Open Access•Robert Y Shapiro, John Young et al.•Political Science Quarterly•1989

  Incluir item

• The Truly Disadvantaged

  Bernard C Watson, William Julius Wilson•The Journal of Negro Education•1988

  Incluir item

• Social Construction of Target Populations

  Open Access•Anne L Schneider, Anne Schneider et al.•American Political Science Review•1993

  Incluir item