Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Constraints on Local Welfare Discretion in an Era of Second‐Order Devolution

Dados Bibliográficos

ID6330786
AutoresAmanda Sheely (0000-0002-1733-6059, autor correspondente)
Ano2018
Volume46
Fascículo3
Páginas651-673
Data de publicação2018-08-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoPolicy Studies Journal (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0190-292X • E-ISSN: 1541-0072
EditoraWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/psj.12186
OpenAlexW2522498597
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas7
Referências citadas38

Under devolution, state and local governments are expected to use the greater authority granted to them to design new and innovative programs that are tailored to local needs. Existing research on the devolution of welfare programs has reported substantial variation in the policies adopted by states in the wake of welfare reform. However, under second‐order devolution, local governments also gained discretion over welfare services. Some have argued that, while devolution should increase flexibility, local governments face constraints that limit their functional discretion. Using California as an example, I assess whether there is variation in the service priorities adopted by local governments and whether these priorities translate to frontline practices. I show differences in the service priorities of local governments; however, these priorities are not associated with differences in sanctioning or time‐limit exemptions. Thus, while local governments may formally adopt different priorities, state and federal policy choices, as well as client characteristics, may restrict priorities from translating into differences in caseworker behavior

Business · Devolution (biology · Discretion · Economics · Flexibility (engineering · Geography · Local government · Order (exchange · Political science · Public economics · Service (business · State (computer science · Welfare · Welfare reform · Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics · Law · Local Government Finance and Decentralization · Public Administration · Public Policy and Administration Research · Finance

  • Whose Need Matters

    Open Access•Paige Kelly, L Lobao•Social Currents•2021

  • In the Shadow of Administrative Decentralization

    Open Access•Yiran Li, Shuo Chen et al.•The American Review of Public…•2023

  • Social Transfer Programs as Non-Spatially-Targeted Methods of Reducing Interregional Geographic Inequality

    Robert Manduca, Catalina Anampa Castro et al.•Social Service Review•2024

  • The local context of energy assistance

    Mariaelisa Graff, Michelle Graff et al.•Local Environment•2025

  • The Local Revolution under Second‐Order Devolution

    Open Access•Markie Mcbrayer•Policy Studies Journal•2021

  • Discussing Policy Theories, Policy Formation, and Analytical Methods

    Open Access•Michael D Jones, Geoboo Song et al.•Policy Studies Journal•2020

  • Latent target groups—A methodological contribution of social identities to policy design research

    Open Access•Johanna Hornung, Nils C Bandelow et al.•Policy Studies Journal•2025

  • Latent Class and Latent Transition Analysis

    Stephanie T Lanza, Brian Flaherty et al.•Handbook of Psychology•2003

  • Hierarchical Linear Models

    Marie Davidian•Journal of the American…•2003

  • Deciding on the Number of Classes in Latent Class Analysis and Growth Mixture Modeling

    Karen Nylund‐gibson, Karen L Nylund et al.•Structural Equation Modeling: A…•2007

  • Localising Welfare-to-Work? Territorial Flexibility and the New Deal for Young People

    Open Access•Corinne Nativel, Peter Sunley et al.•Environment and Planning C…•2002

  • Disciplining the Poor

    Joe So, Joe Soss et al.•Disciplining the Poor•2011

  • Taming the beast

    Open Access•Signe‐mary Mckernan, Signe-Mary Mckernan et al.•Journal of Policy Analysis and…•2005

  • On the front lines of welfare delivery

    Open Access•Marcia K Meyers, Bonnie S Glaser et al.•Journal of Policy Analysis and…•1998

  • States Rights, Women's Obligations

    Suzanne Mettler•Women & Politics•2000

  • Changing The “Culture” Of Welfare Offices

    Open Access•Irene Lurie, Norma M Riccucci•Administration & Society•2003

  • Welfare Realities

    Nan Marie Astone, Mary Jo Bane et al.•Contemporary Sociology A Journal…•1995

  • Measuring State Tanf Policy Variations and Change After Reform

    Open Access•Gordon F De Jong, Deborah Roempke Graefe et al.•Social Science Quarterly•2006

  • Devolution, Discretion, and the Effect of Local Political Values on Tanf Sanctioning

    Richard C Fording, Joe So et al.•Social Service Review•2007

  • Income Poverty and Material Hardship among U.S. Women with Disabilities

    Susan L Parish, Randall A Rose et al.•Social Service Review•2009

  • Organizational Forms as Moral Practices

    Yeheskel Hasenfeld•Social Service Review•2000

  • Inside the Welfare Contract

    Evelyn Z Brodkin•Social Service Review•1997

  • Operating within the Rules

    Andrew J Cherlin, Karen Bogen et al.•Social Service Review•2002

  • The Logic of Sanctioning Welfare Recipients

    Yeheskel Hasenfeld, Toorjo Ghose et al.•Social Service Review•2004

  • Disunited States

    Open Access•Susan B Hansen•Political Science Quarterly•1998

  • States' rights, women's obligations

    Suzanne Mettler•Women & Politics•2000

  • More, Less, or More of the Same? Trends in State Social Welfare Policy in the 1990s

    Marcia K Meyers, Janet C Gornick et al.•Publius The Journal of Federalism•2002

  • Policy Diffusion

    Open Access•Charles R Shipan, Craig Volden•Public Administration Review•2012

  • Second‐Order Devolution and Administrative Exclusion in the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families Program

    Open Access•Amanda Sheely•Policy Studies Journal•2013

  • To Devolve or Not To Devolve? Welfare Reform in the States

    Open Access•Juliet F Gainsborough•Policy Studies Journal•2003

  • An Empirical Assessment of Devolution's Policy Impact

    Open Access•Christine A Kelleher, Susan Webb Yackee•Policy Studies Journal•2004

  • Decentralization, Devolution, Financial Shortfalls, and State Priorities in Service Programs in the Early 2000s

    Michael R Sosin•Journal of Public Administration…•2012

  • Developing and Testing a New Goal Taxonomy

    Randall S Davis, Edmund C Stazyk•Journal of Public Administration…•2015

  • Institutional Logic and Street-Level Discretion

    Eve E Garrow, Oscar Grusky•Journal of Public Administration…•2013

  • The Organization of Discipline

    Joe So, J SOSS et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2011

  • Setting the Terms of Relief

    Joe So, Joe Soss et al.•American Journal of Political…•2001

  • Politics and the New American Welfare States

    Open Access•Matthew Fellowes, Matthew C Fellowes et al.•American Journal of Political…•2004

  • Race, Bureaucratic Discretion, and the Implementation of Welfare Reform

    Open Access•Lael R Keiser, Peter R Mueser et al.•American Journal of Political…•2004

  • Welfare Magnets

    Robert D Plotnick, Paul E Peterson et al.•Industrial and Labor Relations…•1992

  • Evaluating Qualitative Research for Social Work Practitioners

    Open Access•Cynthia A Lietz, Luis E Zayas•Advances in Social Work•2010

  • Multilevel Modelling of Country Effects

    Open Access•Mark L Bryan, Stephen P Jenkins•European Sociological Review•2016

Obras citantes distintas7
Citações por ano1,17
Intervalo de citações2020 - 2025 (6)
Velocidade de citaçãorecent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 7
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae