Decentralization and resource contributions within local governance networks

Evidence from health sector reform in Honduras

Dados Bibliográficos

ID6331007
AutoresAlan Zarychta (0000-0002-4342-2356, Crown Family School of Social Work, Policy, and Practice University of Chicago Chicago Illinois USA, autor correspondente), Jade Wong (0000-0003-1950-9985, Blavatnik School of Government University of Oxford Oxford UK)
Ano2024
Volume52
Fascículo1
Páginas113-137
Data de publicação2024-02-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoPolicy Studies Journal (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0190-292X • E-ISSN: 1541-0072
EditoraWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/psj.12509
OpenAlexW4385810764
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas1
Referências citadas103

Many public services are co‐produced through networks of governmental and non‐governmental organizations that choose to or are obliged to contribute resources, a trend that has been reinforced through decentralization reforms. We utilize original data for 826 organizations across 65 local governance networks to assess how decentralization affects resource contributions while accounting for municipality context, network environment, and organizational attributes. Drawing on a quasi‐experimental design in the context of health sector reform in Honduras, we find that decentralization is associated with a slight reduction in the number of resource ties an organization contributes to other organizations in its network. This association is most prominent where municipal governments, rather than non‐governmental organizations (NGOs) or associations, are lead intermediary organizations under decentralization. Additionally, NGOs contribute more resource ties relative to community associations or public organizations, and consistent with a crowding‐out dynamic, we find that this relationship is attenuated under decentralization. Our results suggest that administrative reforms can influence resource contributing behavior by organizations and the structure of inter‐organizational networks, which are important but underemphasized mechanisms potentially linking decentralization to service delivery outcomes. This is particularly relevant for policymakers working to support network governance for the joint production of public services in under‐resourced settings

Business · Context (archaeology · Corporate governance · Decentralization · Economic system · Economics · Economy · Geography · Management · Market economy · Political science · Public sector · Resource (disambiguation · Resource dependence theory · Service (business · Service delivery framework · Global Maternal and Child Health · Healthcare Systems and Reforms · Public Administration · Public Policy and Administration Research · Marketing