Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Why Public Employees Rebel

Guerrilla Government in the Public Sector

Dados Bibliográficos

ID6366145
AutoresGary E Hollibaugh (0000-0001-9844-2437, University of Pittsburgh), Matthew R Miles (0000-0002-8165-0851, Brigham Young University - Idaho, autor correspondente), Chad B Newswander (0009-0005-2719-310X, Brigham Young University - Idaho)
Ano2019
Volume80
Fascículo1
Páginas64-74
Data de publicação2019-11-19
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoPublic Administration Review (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0033-3352 • E-ISSN: 1540-6210
EditoraWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/puar.13118
OpenAlexW2991391067
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas42
Referências citadas33

Employee recalcitrance and employer reprisal are ever‐present conditions in public service. Yet we have limited knowledge of the forces that move administrators away from acquiescence and toward antagonism. The authors follow the theoretical thrust of behavioral public administration to better understand administrative behavior by targeting the determinants of guerrilla government actions. They do so by presenting the results of a conjoint experiment embedded in a survey of federal bureaucrats. Findings show that decisions to pursue guerrilla activities are conditional on a multitude of factors—namely, the bureaucrat's personal views of the directive as a policy solution, the compatibility of the directive with the bureaucrat's ethical framework, the status of the person issuing the directive, and the probability that the directive might cause harm to others. Notably, these decisions generally are not affected by the probability of retribution or the expected type thereof. However, they are affected by the magnitude of harm that may ensue if orders are obeyed and not resisted

Acquiescence · Business · Citizen journalism · Directive · Economics · Government (linguistics · Harm · Law and economics · Multitude · Political science · Politics · Public sector · Public service · Law · Policing Practices and Perceptions · Public Administration · Public Policy and Administration Research · Regulation and Compliance Studies

  • Bureaucratic Resistance in Times of Democratic Backsliding

    João V Guedes-Neto, B Guy Peters•Bureaucratic Resistance in Times…•2025

  • Public Administration and the Illiberal Challenge

    Open Access•Michael W Bauer•Public Administration and the…•2026

  • Advancing public policy to expose it

    Open Access•K Jurée Capers, Cullen C Merritt•Administrative Theory & Praxis•2026

  • The interactive effects of professionalism and politicization

    Anmol Soni, Evan M Mistur et al.•Public Management Review•2026

  • A connotation to public sector creativity

    Open Access•Glenn Houtgraaf, Peter M Kruyen et al.•Public Management Review•2024

  • Influence tactics and “second-order” change in schools

    Open Access•Devora Friedman, Izhak Berkovich•International Journal of…•2021

  • Populism and Public Bureaucracy During a Crisis – Insights from Israel

    Open Access•Nissim Cohen•International Journal of Public…•2025

  • Promote or Deter

    Open Access•Tyler J Klatt, Matthew R Fairholm et al.•Public Personnel Management•2023

  • Does Size Matter for the Relationship Between Politics and Administration

    Open Access•Hilde Bjørnå, Troy Saghaug Broderstad•Public Administration Review•2026

  • Personality Traits and Agency Politicization

    Open Access•Gary E Hollibaugh, Matthew R Miles•The American Review of Public…•2026

  • How Democratic Backsliding Shapes the Entry, Non‐Entry, and Waiting of Potential Civil Servants

    Open Access•Reut Marciano, Ilana Shpaizman et al.•Public Administration Review•2026

  • The agency of (public) agencies

    Open Access•Luciana Cingolani, Gabriela Lotta et al.•International Review of…•2026

  • Populist attitudes among civil servants

    Open Access•Melissa Tepe, Ekaterina Lytkina•International Review of…•2026

  • Management of Multiple Accountabilities Through Setting Priorities

    Open Access•Marija Aleksovska, Thomas Schillemans et al.•Public Administration Review•2021

  • A taste for government employment also rests on its political flavor

    Open Access•Sharon Gilad, Raanan Sulitzeanu-Kenan et al.•Public Administration Review•2024

  • Rethinking Loyalty and Competence in Presidential Appointments

    Open Access•Richard W Waterman, Ouyang Yu et al.•Public Administration Review•2020

  • A model of bureaucratic capacities against democratic backsliding

    Open Access•Luciana Cingolani, Gabriela Lotta et al.•Perspectives on Public Management…•2025

  • Bureaucracies' Strategies for Coping With Populism

    Open Access•Nissim Cohen, Yekoutiel Sabah•Governance•2025

  • Using behavioral science to improve compliance in government records management

    Open Access•Vincent Hopkins, Christine Kormos•Government Information Quarterly•2026

  • The Burden of Bad Intentions

    Open Access•Chad B Newswander, Matthew R Miles et al.•The American Review of Public…•2024

  • Systematic Review and Metasynthesis

    Open Access•Collin D Cox•Public Administration Review•2025

  • The Organizational Dynamics of Bureaucratic Resistance to Undemocratic Pressures

    Open Access•Maria Cristina Silveira, Mariana Costa Silveira et al.•Public Administration Review•2026

  • Bureaucrats’ willingness to resist democratic backsliding

    J Lobo, José Renato Fragoso Lobo et al.•Policy Studies•2025

  • Does Policy Influence Hollow Out Public Managers’ Political Neutrality

    Open Access•Joachim Åström, Jan Olsson et al.•Administration & Society•2022

  • Anti-Corruption Policy and Whistle-Blowing Intentions

    Open Access•Don S Lee, Annemarie Walter et al.•Administration & Society•2023

  • Revisiting Public Values

    Open Access•Jeremy L Hall, R Paul Battaglio•Public Administration Review•2020

  • Authorized Discretion

    Open Access•Anthony M Bertelli, Vincenza Falletti et al.•Governance•2025

  • Emotional Responses to Bureaucratic Red Tape

    Open Access•Fabian Hattke, David Hensel et al.•Public Administration Review•2019

  • Career Civil Servants’ Socially Embedded Responses to Democratic Backsliding

    Open Access•Saar Alon-Barkat, Sharon Gilad et al.•Perspectives on Politics•2025

  • Leading with dissent

    Collin D Cox•Public Management Review•2025

  • It’s a match

    Guillem Ripoll, Xavier Ballart et al.•Public Management Review•2025

  • How the political elite make decisions

    Open Access•Conor Wynn, Liam Smith et al.•Australian Journal of Public…•2024

  • Exploring administrative evil, the ethics of dissent, and guerrilla government in The Good Place

    Monica Lea•Administrative Theory & Praxis•2024

  • Unethical leadership, moral compensation, and ethical followership

    Open Access•Christian Schuster, Javier Fuenzalida et al.•Public Administration Review•2024

  • When Are Nudges Desirable? Benefit Validity When Preferences Are Not Consistently Revealed

    Open Access•David L Weimer•Public Administration Review•2019

  • Does Administrative Burden Influence Public Support for Government Programs? Evidence from a Survey Experiment

    Open Access•Lael R Keiser, Susan M Miller•Public Administration Review•2019

  • Ministerial Leadership and Endorsement of Bureaucrats

    Open Access•Don S Lee, Soonae Park•Public Administration Review•2020

  • Pursuing Consilience

    Open Access•Christopher Carrigan, Sanjay K Pandey et al.•Public Administration Review•2019

  • Exit, Voice, and Sabotage

    Open Access•Christian Schuster, Kim Sass Mikkelsen et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2022

  • Breaking the rules, but for whom? How client characteristics affect frontline professionals’ prosocial rule-breaking behavior

    Open Access•Eduard Schmidt, Bernard Bernards et al.•Journal of Public Administration…•2025

  • Street‐level bureaucracy and democratic backsliding. Evidence from Poland

    Open Access•Barbara Maria Piotrowska•Governance•2024

  • Technocrat or partisan cabinet ministers

    Open Access•Marta Batista•European Journal of Political…•2024

  • The Unitary Executive

    Steven G Calabresi, Christopher S Yoo•The Unitary Executive•2008

  • Whistle-Blowing

    Open Access•Janet P Near, Marcia P Miceli•Journal of Management•1996

  • Essence of Decision

    Graham T Allison•Essence of Decision•1972

  • Above Politics

    Open Access•Gary J Miller, Andrew B Whitford•Above Politics•2016

  • Emotional Labor

    Mary E Guy, Meredith A Newman et al.•Emotional Labor•2014

  • Cops, Teachers, Counselors

    Steven Maynard-Moody, Steven Maynard‐moody et al.•Cops, Teachers, Counselors•2003

  • The Value of The Dichotomy

    Patrick Overeem•Administrative Theory & Praxis•2005

  • Whistle-Blowing

    Open Access•Cecilia Florencia Lavena•The American Review of Public…•2014

  • Public Service Motivation and Decisions to Report Wrongdoing in U.S. Federal Agencies

    Open Access•James Gerard Caillier•The American Review of Public…•2016

  • Behavioral Public Administration

    Open Access•Stephan Grimmelikhuijsen, Sebastian Jilke et al.•Public Administration Review•2016

  • Behavioral Public Administration ad fontes

    Open Access•R Paul Battaglio, Paolo Belardinelli et al.•Public Administration Review•2018

  • Public Sector Governance Reform and the Motivation of Street‐Level Bureaucrats in Developing Countries

    Open Access•Alan Zarychta, Tara Grillos et al.•Public Administration Review•2019

  • Ethical Climate and Rule Bending

    Open Access•Erin L Borry•Public Administration•2017

  • Civil Servants and Their Constitutions

    Open Access•Louis Fisher•Political Science Quarterly•2002

  • Red Tape

    J Ron Stanfield, H S Kaufman et al.•Southern Economic Journal•1978

  • Emotional Responses to Bureaucratic Red Tape

    Open Access•Fabian Hattke, David Hensel et al.•Public Administration Review•2019

  • Thick Red Tape and the Thin Blue Line

    Open Access•Elizabeth Linos, Nefara Riesch•Public Administration Review•2019

  • Moral Leadership and Administrative Statesmanship

    Open Access•Chad B Newswander•Public Administration Review•2012

  • The Unbureaucratic Personality

    Open Access•Leisha Dehart‐davi•Public Administration Review•2007

  • Guerrilla Statesmanship

    Open Access•Chad B Newswander•Public Administration Review•2014

  • Does Administrative Burden Influence Public Support for Government Programs? Evidence from a Survey Experiment

    Open Access•Lael R Keiser, Susan M Miller•Public Administration Review•2019

  • Human Capital and Administrative Burden

    Open Access•Julian Christensen, Lene Aarøe et al.•Public Administration Review•2019

  • Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research

    Open Access•Adam J Berinsky, Gregory A Huber et al.•Political Analysis•2012

  • Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis

    Open Access•Jens Hainmueller, D J Hopkins et al.•Political Analysis•2014

  • Mind the Gap

    Anat Gofen•Journal of Public Administration…•2014

  • The Principal's Moral Hazard

    Gary J Miller, Andrew B Whitford•Journal of Public Administration…•2006

  • Testing a Revised Measure of Public Service Motivation

    Open Access•Kim, Sangmook Kim•Journal of Public Administration…•2011

  • Agency Retaliation Against Whistle-Blowers

    James Gerard Caillier•Public Integrity•2012

  • The 2016 John Gaus Lecture

    Open Access•Rosemary O’leary•PS Political Science & Politics•2017

Obras citantes distintas42
Citações por ano6
Intervalo de citações2019 - 2026 (8)
Velocidade de citaçãocurrent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 42
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae