The Effect of Advance Letters on Cooperation in a List Sample Telephone Survey

Journal Article The Effect of Advance Letters on Cooperation in a List Sample Telephone Survey Get access KENNETH M. GOLDSTEIN, KENNETH M. GOLDSTEIN Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar M. KENT JENNINGS M. KENT JENNINGS Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Public Opinion Quarterly, Volume 66, Issue 4, February 2002, Pages 608–617, https://doi.org/10.1086/343756 Published: 01 February 2002

Advertising · Business · Library science · Media studies · Sample (material · Sociology · Telephone number · Telephone survey · Computer Science · History · Psychology · Survey Methodology and Nonresponse · Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques

• Online, face-to-face and telephone surveys—Comparing different sampling methods in wine consumer research

  Open Access•Gergely Szolnoki, Dieter Hoffmann•Wine Economics and Policy•2013

  Incluir item

• Extracting epidemiological knowledge of shrimp farmers applying participatory appraisal tools and mobile phone-assisted survey to identify and solve the problems of WSD

  Open Access•Neaz A Hasan, Mohammad Mahfujul Haque•Social Sciences & Humanities Open•2023

  Incluir item

• Exploring the Impact of E-mail and Postcard Prenotification on Response Rates to a Mail Survey in an Academic Setting

  Open Access•Leslie McCallister, Leslie A McCallister et al.•Journal of Applied Social Science•2008

  Incluir item

• The value of online surveys

  Open Access•Joel R Evans, Anil Mathur•Internet Research•2005

  Incluir item

• The Influence of Advance Letters on Response in Telephone Surveys

  Edith D De Leeuw, Mario Callegaro et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2007

  Incluir item

• Has the National Do Not Call Registry Helped or Hurt State-Level Response Rates

  Michael W Link, Michael Link et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2006

  Incluir item

• Do Advance Letters Improve Preelection Forecast Accuracy

  Christopher B Mann•Public Opinion Quarterly•2005

  Incluir item

• Targeted Appeals for Participation in Letters to Panel Survey Members

  Peter Lynn•Public Opinion Quarterly•2016

  Incluir item

• Advance Letters as a Means of Improving Respondent Cooperation in Random Digit Dial Studies

  M W Link, Michael Link•Public Opinion Quarterly•2005

  Incluir item

• Do impersonal mobilisation methods work? Evidence from a nationwide Get-Out-the-Vote experiment in England

  Edward Fieldhouse, David Cutts et al.•Electoral Studies•2013

  Incluir item

• Factors Affecting Response Rates to Mailed Questionnaires

  Thomas A Heberlein, R Baumgartner•American Sociological Review•1978

  Incluir item

• Using Dual Frame Designs to Reduce Nonresponse in Telephone Surveys

  Michael W Traugott, Robert M Groves et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•1987

  Incluir item

• Consequences of Reducing Nonresponse in a National Telephone Survey

  Scott Keeter, Carolyn Miller et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2000

  Incluir item

• Leverage-Saliency Theory of Survey Participation

  Robert M Groves, Eleanor Singer et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2000

  Incluir item

• Reducing Refusal Rates for Telephone Interviews

  D A Dillman, J G Gallegos et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•1976

  Incluir item

• Experiments with Incentives in Telephone Surveys

  Eleanor Singer, John Van Hoewyk et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2000

  Incluir item

• Understanding The Decision to Participate in a Survey

  Robert M Groves, Robert B Cialdini et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•1992

  Incluir item