Sampling Telephone Numbers and Adults, Interview Length, and Weighting in The California Health Interview Survey Cell Phone Pilot Study

This article describes several features included in a California Health Interview Survey cell phone pilot study that differ from earlier cell phone surveys conducted in the United States. One difference is that the study used a screening design and only adults living in cell-only households were interviewed. Most of the previous studies used dual frame designs. Another difference was the development and implementation of a within-household adult sampling procedure to cover adults when cell phones were shared in the household. The study was also intended to determine if conducting a cell phone interview of the same scope and length as a regular telephone interview was feasible. Most previous surveys were focused on cell phone topics and were shorter than the comparable landline surveys. We then explore some interesting problems that arise in weighting a cell phone survey using a screening design. We conclude with a discussion of planning a new cell phone survey in 2007 that incorporates findings from this study

Advertising · Business · Environmental health · Interview · Landline · Phone · Sampling (signal processing · Sampling design · Sampling frame · Sociology · Statistics · Survey methodology · Telecommunications · Telephone interview · Telephone survey · Weighting · Computer Science · Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods · Mathematics · Medicine · Psychology · Smoking Behavior and Cessation · Survey Methodology and Nonresponse · Applied Psychology

• To call or not to call

  Open Access•Nasir Umar, J Schellenberg et al.•BMJ Global Health•2022

  Incluir item

• Do We Need to Go Cellular? Assessing Political Media Consumption Using a Single-Frame Landline/Cellular Survey Design

  Megan Hill, John M Tchernev et al.•Mass Communication & Society•2012

  Incluir item

• Do Initial Respondents Differ From Callback Respondents? Lessons From a Mobile Cati Survey

  Open Access•Paula Vicente, Catarina Marques•Social Science Computer Review•2016

  Incluir item

• Mobile Phones in an Environment of Competing Survey Modes

  Open Access•Vehovar, Nejc Berzelak et al.•Social Science Computer Review•2010

  Incluir item

• Telephone Survey Calling Patterns, Productivity, Survey Responses, and Their Effect on Measuring Public Opinion

  Open Access•Enrijeta Shino, C Mccarty•CAM•2020

  Incluir item

• The State of Surveying Cell Phone Numbers in the United States

  Paul J Lavrakas, Charles D Shuttles et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2007

  Incluir item

• Implications of Moving Public Opinion Surveys to a Single-Frame Cell-Phone Random-Digit-Dial Design

  Open Access•Courtney Kennedy, Kyley Mcgeeney et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2018

  Incluir item

• Bias From Wireless Substitution in Surveys of Hispanics

  Open Access•David Dutwin, Scott Keeter et al.•Hispanic Journal of Behavioral…•2010

  Incluir item

• Comparison of Cell Phone and Landline Surveys

  Open Access•Lisa R Carley-Baxter, Andy Peytchev et al.•CAM•2010

  Incluir item

• Piloting Data Collection via Cell Phones

  Open Access•Randal Zuwallack•CAM•2009

  Incluir item

• Ghosted

  Open Access•Blair Sackett•Journal of Contemporary Ethnography•2024

  Incluir item

• Utilizing Smartphones to Study Disadvantaged and Hard-to-Reach Groups

  Open Access•Naomi F Sugie•Sociological Methods & Research•2018

  Incluir item

• Who needs RDD? Combining directory listings with cell phone exchanges for an alternative telephone sampling frame

  Open Access•Thomas M Guterbock, Abdoulaye Diop et al.•Social Science Research•2011

  Incluir item

• Cell Phone Survey Feasibility in The U.S

  J Michael Brick, P D Brick et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2007

  Incluir item

• Nonresponse Bias in a Dual Frame Sample of Cell and Landline Numbers

  J Michael Brick, Sarah Dipko et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2006

  Incluir item

• Household Telephone Service and Usage Patterns in the United states in 2004

  C Tucker, Charles L Tucker et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2007

  Incluir item