Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Private Law Models for Public Law Concepts

The Roman Law Theory of Dominium in the Monarchomach Doctrine of Popular Sovereignty

Dados Bibliográficos

ID6400680
AutoresDaniel Lee (0000-0003-0789-058X), Daniel S Lee (0000-0001-9671-5817, autor correspondente)
Ano2008
Volume70
Fascículo3
Páginas370-399
Data de publicação2008-01-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoThe Review of Politics (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0034-6705 • E-ISSN: 1748-6858
EditoraCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0034670508000557
OpenAlexW2136584859
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas6
Referências citadas50

The essay traces the juridical origins of the modern doctrine of popular sovereignty as developed by the monarchomach jurists of the late sixteenth century. Particularly, the use of doctrines from the Roman law of property explains the sovereign right of the people to resist and reconstitute the commonwealth. Reviving the civilian concept of dominium during the French Wars of Religion and dynastic royal politics, these radical jurists articulated the claim that the people, not kings, have property rights over the commonwealth. By conceptualizing the people corporately as property-owners in this way, they were able to draw on legal arguments from Roman law to justify popular resistance as an assertion of a corporate property right. In doing so, the monarchomachs expressed an elaborate theory of state and sovereignty within the grammar of the Roman private law

Assertion · Commonwealth · Doctrine · Law and economics · Political science · Politics · Popular sovereignty · Private property · Property (philosophy · Sociology · Sovereignty · Historical Economic and Legal Thought · Law · Legal principles and applications · Philosophy · Political Theory and Influence

  • Liberal Governmentality and the Political Theology of Constitutionalism

    Open Access•Miguel Vatter•Sovereignty in Action•2019

  • The Immortal Commonwealth

    Open Access•David P Henreckson•Immortal Commonwealth•2019

  • Divine Democracy

    Miguel Vatter•Divine Democracy•2020

  • Confucian democracy as popular sovereignty

    Ranjoo Seodu Herr•Asian Philosophy•2019

  • The nation and property in Vattel’s theory of territory

    Benjamin Mueser•Global Intellectual History•2018

  • Mirage or Vision

    Uriel Abulof•Ethnopolitics•2016

  • From Politics to Reason of State

    Open Access•Maurizio Viroli•From Politics to Reason of State•1992

  • Natural Rights Theories

    Open Access•Richard Tuck•Natural Rights Theories•1979

  • The Languages of Political Theory in Early-Modern Europe

    Open Access•Anthony Pagden•Languages of Political Theory in…•1987

  • The Legacy of Jean Bodin

    J H M Salmon•Ideas and Contexts in France and…•2024

  • Constitutional Thought in Sixteenth-Century France

    Beatrice Reynolds, William Farr Church•The American Historical Review•1942

  • Myths About the St. Bartholomew’s Day Massacres, 1572–1576

    Robert M Kingdon•Myths about the St. Bartholomew's…•1988

  • Anarchy, State, and Utopia

    Robert Nozick•Princeton Readings in Political…•2018

  • Philosophy and Government 1572–1651

    Open Access•Richard Tuck•Philosophy and Government,…•1993

  • The Political Thought of the Dutch Revolt 1555–1590

    Open Access•Martin van Gelderen•Political Thought of the Dutch…•1992

  • Lordship, Kingship, and Empire

    J H Burns•Lordship, kingship, and empire•1992

  • Intellectual Origins of the English Revolution

    H F Kearney, Hugh Kearney•Philosophical Studies•1966

  • The Cambridge History of Medieval Political Thought c.350–c.1450

    Open Access•Henry Chadwick, J F Procopé et al.•The Cambridge history of medieval…•1988

  • Monarchy and Community

    Richard Kay, Antony Black•The American Historical Review•1972

  • Two Treatises of Government, by John Locke, Peter Laslett

    Open Access•Rosalie L Colie•Political Science Quarterly•1961

  • The Cambridge History of Political Thought, 1450-1700.

    Mark Hulliung, J H Burns•The American Historical Review•1992

  • The Royal Prerogative and the Learning of the Inns of Court

    Open Access•Margaret Mcglynn•Royal Prerogative and the…•2003

  • A Dictionary of Greek and Roman Antiquities

    Open Access•W C Smith, William Smith•Dictionary of Greek and Roman…•2013

  • The Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law

    Open Access•J G A Pocock•Ancient Constitution and the…•1987

  • Renaissance and Revolt

    De Lamar Jensen•Sixteenth Century Journal•1988

  • Philosophy and Government 1572-1651

    J Sears Mcgee•Sixteenth Century Journal•1994

  • Law, Resistance and the State. The Opposition to Roman Law in Reformation Germany

    Charles E Daniel•Sixteenth Century Journal•1987

  • Myths about the St. Bartholomew's Day Massacres 1572-1576

    William Monter•Sixteenth Century Journal•1988

  • From Defense to Resistance

    Kathleen A Parrow•Transactions of the American…•1993

  • Historical Introduction to the Study of Roman Law

    Foster H Sherwood, H F Jolowicz•The Western Political Quarterly•1953

  • The Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law

    Open Access•R K Webb, Russell Webb•Political Science Quarterly•1958

  • On the Road from Constance to 1688

    Open Access•Francis Oakley•Journal of British Studies•1962

  • Inventing the People

    Joyce Appleby, Edmund S Morgan•Journal of American History•1989

  • The Political Theory of the Huguenots

    E Armstrong•The English Historical Review•1889

  • A History of Political Thought in the Sixteenth Century

    C H Mcilwain, J W Allen et al.•Economica•1929

  • The Juristic Basis of Dynastic Right to the French Throne

    Ralph E Giesey•Transactions of the American…•1961

  • Rethinking Republicanism

    Open Access•Anne Mclaren•The Historical Journal•2006

  • King John and the Historians

    Open Access•C Warren Hollister•Journal of British Studies•1961

  • Law in the Vindiciae, Contra Tyrannos

    Open Access•George Garnett•The Historical Journal•2006

  • Intellectual Origins of the English Revolution

    H R Trevor-Roper, Hugh Trevor-Roper et al.•History and Theory•1966

  • From Constance to 1688 Revisited

    Francis Oakley•Journal of the History of Ideas•1966

  • Anarchy, State, and Utopia

    Karen Johnson, Robert Nozick•The Western Political Quarterly•1975

  • State-Building in Early Modern France

    Ralph E Giesey•The Journal of Modern History•1983

  • Anxieties of Influence

    Francis Oakley•Past & Present•1996

  • The King's Two Bodies

    Ernst H Kantorowicz, Conrad Leyser et al.•King's Two Bodies•2016

  • John Locke Two Treatises of Government

    Open Access•John Locke, Peter Laslett•Locke•1988

Obras citantes distintas6
Citações por ano0,6
Intervalo de citações2016 - 2020 (5)
Velocidade de citaçãohistorical
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 6
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae