Marriage, Slavery, and Natural Rights in the Political Thought of Aquinas

Recent scholarship has demonstrated that the language of subjective natural rights can be found in a wide variety of medieval juristic and scholastic texts. This is part of a general trend in the study of political ideas that stresses the continuity between medieval and modern political values. However, many leading scholars of medieval political ideas maintain that no language of subjective natural rights can be found in Aquinas's political writings, based as they are on a famous objective definition of right (jus) as the object of justice (justitia). Other scholars argue that Aquinas's notion of subjective rights is peripheral to his political philosophy. The essay argues that Aquinas, while commenting on canon law texts, explicitly posits a subjective natural right to marry, based on the natural equality and natural liberty of all human beings. This can be seen by his claim that a slave may contract marriage, even without the consent of the master. This is one example of an instance in which Aquinas refers to specific legal issues in order to explicate his understanding of liberty and right. For Aquinas there are certain areas of liberty or mastery (dominium) that are exempt from all human authority, and wherein a person has rights to decide how to pursue natural human goods

Economic Justice · Epistemology · Human rights · Linguistics · Natural (archaeology · Natural law · Object (grammar · Order (exchange · Political philosophy · Political science · Politics · Scholarship · Sociology · Historical Economic and Legal Thought · History · Law · Medieval Philosophy and Theology · Philosophy · Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought

• Středověké kořeny moderních manželských práv

  Open Access•Pavel Blažek•Aither•2025

  Incluir item

• Natural Law and Natural Rights

  Open Access•Brian Tierney•The Review of Politics•2002

  Incluir item

• Political Thought in Europe, 1250–1450

  Open Access•Antony Black•Political Thought in Europe,…•1992

  Incluir item

• Natural Right and History

  Leo Strauss•Natural Right and History…•1965

  Incluir item

• Religion, Law and the Growth of Constitutional Thought, 1150-1650

  Open Access•Brian Tierney•Religion, Law and the Growth of…•1982

  Incluir item

• Natural Rights Theories

  Open Access•Richard Tuck•Natural Rights Theories•1979

  Incluir item

• The Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy

  Open Access•Norman Kretzmann, Anthony Kenny et al.•The Cambridge history of later…•1982

  Incluir item

• The Cambridge Companion to Aquinas

  Open Access•Jan A Aertsen, Cóilín Owens et al.•The Cambridge companion to Aquinas•1993

  Incluir item

• Difference and Dissent

  Edwin Bezzina•Sixteenth Century Journal•1999

  Incluir item

• Natural Law and Right in Aquinas' Political Thought

  Open Access•Jack Donnelly•The Western Political Quarterly•1980

  Incluir item

• Natural Law and Natural Rights

  William H Wilcox, John Finnis•The Philosophical Review•1983

  Incluir item

• Natural Right and History

  John Plamenatz, Leo Strauss•The Philosophical Review•1955

  Incluir item

• The Political Theory of Possessive Individualism

  J P Day, John Day et al.•The Philosophical Quarterly•1964

  Incluir item

• Property and Protest

  Open Access•Cary J Nederman•The Review of Politics•1996

  Incluir item

• Marsilius on Rights

  Brian Tierney•Journal of the History of Ideas•1991

  Incluir item

• Foundations of Modern Political Thought

  Donald R Kelley, Quentin Skinner•Journal of the History of Ideas•1979

  Incluir item

• Wyclif on Rights

  Stephen E Lahey•Journal of the History of Ideas•1997

  Incluir item

• Freedom, Community and Function

  Open Access•Cary J Nederman•American Political Science Review•1992

  Incluir item