Whose Politics? Reflections on Clarence Stone’s Regime Politics

Dados Bibliográficos

ID6404583
AutoresMichael Jones-Correa (Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA), Michael Jones‐correa (0000-0002-8596-9341, Cornell University), Diane Wong (0000-0003-3339-3544, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA), D S Wong (Cornell University)
Ano2015
Volume51
Fascículo1
Páginas161-170
Data de publicação2015-01-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoUrban Affairs Review (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1078-0874 • E-ISSN: 1552-8332
EditoraSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/1078087414558949
OpenAlexW2152715429
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas13
Referências citadas6

Stone’s retrospective article holds to the view of his earlier work that a city’s fundamental capacity to confront existential challenges is made possible only by the engagement of elite actors with the resources for sustained politics. In this article, we set out to illustrate ways in which actors marginal to regime politics—neighborhood organizations, nonprofits, labor movements, and immigrant groups—can offer examples of sustained politics that provide alternate agendas for city politics by looking at three different policy arenas in three different cities: housing in New York, labor rights in Los Angeles, and education in Detroit

Elite · Existentialism · Immigration · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Urban politics · Work (physics · Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism · Labor Movements and Unions · Law · Political and Economic history of UK and US · Public Administration