Gender Diversity, Women’s Leadership, and Consensus in State Supreme Courts
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 6409552 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Meghan E Leonard (0000-0003-1671-2515, Illinois State University, autor correspondente), Joseph V Ro (0000-0003-3594-7408, Florida Gulf Coast University) |
| Ano | 2020 |
| Volume | 41 |
| Fascículo | 3 |
| Páginas | 278-302 |
| Data de publicação | 2020-07-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Women & Politics (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0195-7732 • E-ISSN: 1540-9473 |
| Editora | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/1554477x.2019.1698213 |
| OpenAlex | W3006435781 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 6 |
| Referências citadas | 49 |
In this article, we argue that the leadership of women as chief justice or the majority opinion author, as well as an increased presence of women on the panel, should increase the likelihood of unanimous decisions and the size of majority coalitions in state supreme courts. Using an original dataset of cases in three policy areas from all state supreme courts from 1990-2015, we uncover some surprising results. In some issue areas, majority coalitions are larger when a woman serves as the majority opinion author, though we see smaller coalitions when more women are on the court and a man is assigned to write the majority opinion. Taken together, our results suggest that the role of gender diversity and women’s leadership in the opinion-writing process may be more complex than previously understood
Diversity (politics · Economic Justice · Majority opinion · Opinion leadership · Political science · State (computer science · State supreme court · Supreme court · Gender Politics and Representation · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
Does Descriptive Representation of Women on the Bench Improve Institutional Trust
A Fresh Perspective
I Can’t See You; Can You Hear Me? Gender Norms and Context During In-Person and Teleconference U.S. Supreme Court Oral Arguments
Beyond Consensus
Diversity in Judicial Leadership in the American States
Well said
When Women Lead
Judicial Review in State Supreme Courts
Institutional Dynamics on the U.S. Court of Appeals
Diversity, Deliberation, and Judicial Opinion Writing
She’ll Settle It
Justifying Gender Equality on the Bench
How far does the gender gap extend
Gender and Racial Diversification of State Supreme Courts
Gender, Race, and Dissensus on State Supreme Courts
Gender and Justice
Diversity Matters
Gender, Status, and Leadership
The Leadership Styles of Women and Men
Measuring the Professionalization of U.S. State Courts of Last Resort
The Influence of Amicus Curiae Briefs on U.S. Supreme Court Opinion Content
The Norm of Consensus on the U.S. Supreme Court
Rethinking Critical Mass in the Federal Appellate Courts
Women Rule
Judge Gender, Critical Mass, and Decision Making in the Appellate Courts of Canada
Neo-Institutionalism and Dissent in State Supreme Courts
Recruitment of Chief Justices on State Supreme Courts
Integrated Models of Judicial Dissent
Measuring the Preferences of State Supreme Court Judges
A Reappraisal of Diversification in the Federal Courts
Consensus and Cooperation on State Supreme Courts
A Bootstrap Method for Conducting Statistical Inference with Clustered Data
Standing for Women? Which Women? The Substantive Representation of Women's Interests and the Research Imperative of Intersectionality
Representation on the Courts? The Effects of Trial Judges’ Sex and Race
Gender, Race, and Intersectionality on the Federal Appellate Bench
Race and Gender Bias in Three Administrative Contexts
Racial Diversity and Judicial Influence on Appellate Courts
State Public Opinion, the Death Penalty, and the Practice of Electing Judges
Untangling the Causal Effects of Sex on Judging
Accountability and Coercion
Structuring Gender's Impact
Discouraging Dissent
Gender, Critical Mass, and Judicial Decision Making
Trailblazers and Those That Followed
Power and Influence in State Legislative Policymaking
Judicial Selection and Death Penalty Decisions
Order in the Courts
The Gender System and Interaction
| Obras citantes distintas | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 1,5 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2022 - 2025 (4) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 6 |