Restitution of material objects and indigenous ontology
Towards coloniality of dispossession/theft in Africa
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 6429307 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Charles Amo-Agyemang (0000-0002-3357-2019, University of Ghana, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2024 |
| Volume | 31 |
| Fascículo | 6 |
| Páginas | 735-750 |
| Data de publicação | 2024-06-07 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | International Journal of Cultural Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1028-6632 • E-ISSN: 1477-2833 |
| Editora | Routledge (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/10286632.2024.2363420 |
| OpenAlex | W4399436390 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 3 |
| Referências citadas | 43 |
Indigenous African people had mastery and ownership of material objects and land more broadly before colonialism and enslavement. Without indigenous people mastery and ownership over their material objects, indigenous progress, liberation, development, and emancipation would be elusive. This paper contends that decolonization/decoloniality is a function of abating dispossession/theft of indigenous material objects by imperialists through restitution and repossession. In fact, to forestall claims for restitution and reparations require mastery and ownership of their material objects to enable those that are colonized to assume sovereignty and autonomy. This paper theorizes coloniality as theft/dispossession as its critical framework. The underlying argument here is that theorizing coloniality as theft/dispossession makes it possible to conceive of the limitations of theories that define coloniality simplistically in terms of hierarchies, binaries, and dominance. Based on this assemblage, I frame the coloniality of theft/dispossession along the Asante (the people of Ghana) dispossessed material objects in the eras of colonialism and enslavement. The paper concludes that decolonizing ontologies by way of restitution is a necessary component of the process of reversing colonial/imperial theft/dispossession of objects for which they should be compensated as part of the process of decolonization rather than erroneous conceptualization of decolonization in terms of hierarchy, oppression, and binaries
Epistemology · Indigenous · Ontology · Political science · Restitution · African cultural and philosophical studies · Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development · Anthropological Studies and Insights · Law · Philosophy · Ecology
Sovereignty Becoming Pulvereignty
Why African (Akan) thought has no concept of race
Reflections on the issue of repatriation of looted and illegally acquired African cultural objects in Western museums
The Sense of Interconnectedness in African Thought-Patterns
Even Chameleons Stalk Their Prey
Sentient Flesh
How Colonialism Preempted Modernity in Africa
Reconsidering Reparations
Hakuna Mhou Inokumira Mhuru Isiri Yayo
Chisi Chako Masimba Mashoma/Kunzi Pakata Sandi Kunzi Ridza
Resettled but not redressed
Impact of land grabbing on food security
An Oral Philosophy of Personhood
Museums as Intermediaries in Repatriation
Academics with Clay Feet? Anthropological Perspectives on Academic Freedom in Twenty-First Century African Universities
Resilience and the Rise of Speculative Humanitarianism
Against Decolonisation
Biofuels and the hazards of land grabbing
Race and a decolonial turn in development studies
Mainstreaming the Discourse on Restitution and Repatriation within African History, Heritage Studies and Political Science
Art as Contextual Epistemology
The Days of their Heedless Power Were Over and Done’
Restitution vs. Retention
Whither Europe
The Brutish Museums
Restitution of African colonial artefacts
Data Colonialism
Anthropocene futures
The Politics of Land Grabbing
| Obras citantes distintas | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 3 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 3 |