Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

The Internet Research Agency Campaign to Influence the 2016 US Presidential Elections

A Rhetorical Analysis

Dados Bibliográficos

ID6434236
AutoresNick Nelson (0000-0001-6844-9611, School of Psychology Massey University Auckland New Zealand), Darrin Hodgetts (0000-0001-8726-5965, School of Psychology Massey University Auckland New Zealand), Kerry Chamberlain (0000-0002-1011-4293, School of Psychology Massey University Auckland New Zealand)
Ano2025
Volume35
Fascículo5
Data de publicação2025-08-19
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoJournal of Community & Applied Social Psychology (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1052-9284 • E-ISSN: 1099-1298
EditoraWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/casp.70163
OpenAlexW4413307775
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas1
Referências citadas29

The centrality of information and communicative processes in persuading society has, historically, made the media one of the key networks of power and influence in society. The rapid expansion of social media platforms has, however, enabled revolutionary changes in how this power is wielded and how persuasion occurs. This has had a profound impact on how political, economic, and social issues are understood and addressed. While a comprehensive body of social psychological theory and applied practice on the topic of persuasion has been developed over many years, persuasion in the contemporary social media environment is one that researchers are yet to fully understand. Methods for achieving this understanding continue to evolve. This article draws on a large corpus of material (2218 Facebook advertisements and metadata) which documented the Russian Internet Research Agency campaign to influence the outcome of the 2016 US presidential elections. Drawing on Aristotle's rhetorical framework, this article presents a process analysis to understand how political persuasion is undertaken in the contemporary social media environment. The findings provide new insights into the social psychological processes of persuasion in contemporary society and demonstrate the utility of a rhetorical framework in understanding persuasion campaigns in dynamic digital settings

Advertising · Agency (philosophy · Art · Business · Literature · Media studies · Political science · Politics · Presidential campaign · Presidential system · Public relations · Rhetorical question · Social science · Sociology · The Internet · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Law · Media Studies and Communication · Public Administration · Rhetoric and Communication Studies · Social Media and Politics

  • From the agora to the algorithm

    Open Access•Nick Nelson, Darrin Hodgetts et al.•Theory & Psychology•2026

  • Algorithmic amplification of politics on Twitter

    Open Access•Ferenc Huszár, Sofia Ira Ktena et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2022

  • Contextual prerequisites for understanding

    Open Access•John D Bransford, Marcia K Johnson•Journal of Verbal Learning and…•1972

  • Memes and symbolic violence

    Julia R Decook•Learning Media and Technology•2018

  • Levels of processing

    Open Access•Fergus I M Craik, Robert S Lockhart•Journal of Verbal Learning and…•1972

  • Classical Rhetoric for the Modern Student

    W Ross Winterowd, Edward P J Corbett•College Composition and…•1966

  • Victory without Casualties

    T S Allen, A J Moore et al.•The US Army War College Quarterly…•2018

  • Cognitive Responses in Persuasion

    Richard E Petty, Richard Petty et al.•Cognitive Responses in Persuasion•2014

  • Manufacturing rage

    Open Access•Ahmed Al-Rawi, Anis Rahman•First Monday•2020

  • Memeingful memories and the art of resistance

    Open Access•Lisa Ellen Silvestri, Lisa Silvestri•New Media & Society•2018

  • Case‐based Research in Community and Social Psychology

    Open Access•Darrin Hodgetts, Darrin James Hodgetts et al.•Journal of Community & Applied…•2012

  • Memory, politics and emotions

    Mykola Makhortykh, Juan-Manuel González-Aguilar et al.•Continuum•2020

  • Time, Times, and the ‘Right Time’; Chronos and Kairos

    John E Smith, Sherwood J B Sugden•The Monist•1969

  • Virtual Hatred

    Open Access•William Aceves, William J Aceves•Michigan Journal of Race & Law•2019

  • Voters, Emotions, and Memory

    Open Access•Andrew J W Civettini, David P Redlawsk•Political Psychology•2009

  • Targeting Ontological Security

    Open Access•Derek Bolton•Political Psychology•2021

  • Social and Cognitive Aspects of the Vulnerability to Political Misinformation

    Open Access•Myrto Pantazi, Scott Hale et al.•Political Psychology•2021

  • Qualitative Data Analysis

    Open Access•Matthew B Miles, A Michael Huberman•Journal of Environmental Psychology•1994

  • Black Memes Matter

    Open Access•Apryl Williams•Social Media + Society•2020

  • The Politics of Twitter

    Open Access•Constance Duncombe•International Political Sociology•2019

Obras citantes distintas1
Citações por ano1
Intervalo de citações2026 - 2026 (1)
Velocidade de citaçãocurrent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 1
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae