Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Exploring alternative care options for children in China

Recent Developments and Challenges

Dados Bibliográficos

ID6438005
AutoresShian Yin (0000-0002-1361-1471, Coventry University, autor correspondente)
Ano2024
Volume19
Fascículo3
Páginas634-658
Data de publicação2024-05-08
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoJournal of Public Child Welfare (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1554-8732 • E-ISSN: 1554-8740
EditoraTaylor & Francis (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/15548732.2024.2349156
OpenAlexW4396732405
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas12
Referências citadas20

In recent years, there has been increasing recognition of the complexities surrounding alternative care arrangements for children, especially within China's changing childcare landscape. This paper addresses the gap in understanding the nuances of alternative care options in China by conducting a narrative review of existing literature and governmental documents, focusing specifically on kinship care, institutional care, family foster care, and adoption. The review reveals recent developments and current challenges associated with each form of alternative care, providing insights into the evolving childcare system in China. Key findings include significant progress in diversifying childcare options, increased funding investment in the system, and efforts to standardize alternative childcare practices through policies and legislative measures. However, challenges persist in promoting psychosocial development and preparing individuals living in institutions for leaving care, ensuring adequate resources and support for kinship caregivers, and enhancing participation rates in family foster care and adoption practices. Practical implications for policymakers and child welfare agencies are discussed, emphasizing the importance of promoting family-based care options, providing quality caregiver training, considering various aspects of children's needs, extending support for kinship care, and formulating inclusive adoption policies

Business · China · Political science · Child Abuse and Trauma · Child Welfare and Adoption · Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences · Medicine · Psychology

  • ‘I still can’t really leave this place’

    Open Access•Shian Yin•Disability & Society•2026

  • Division of childcare policy actors under health-oriented goals

    Open Access•Linan Li, Junyu Li•Frontiers in Public Health•2024

  • Perceptions of adulthood in context

    Open Access•Shian Yin•Current Psychology•2026

  • What makes care-experienced young people ‘survivors’ in education

    Shian Yin, Zhaomu Zeng•Oxford Review of Education•2026

  • From global families to domestic solutions

    Open Access•Shian Yin•Journal of Public Child Welfare•2025

  • I hate those words, I love you!’. Care-leavers’ reflections of orphanage tourism

    Open Access•Jonnell Uptin•Tourism Geographies•2025

  • Diverse Pathways and the Role of Timing

    Open Access•Shian Yin, Siobhan E Laird et al.•Child & Family Social Work•2025

  • Risks and challenges of living in Institutions

    Open Access•Shian Yin•Children and Youth Services Review•2024

  • So Goes China

    Open Access•K E Cheney, Karen S Rotabi-Casares et al.•Journal of Human Rights and…•2025

  • Unachievable adulthood?!” – exploring family formation journeys of care leavers in China

    Open Access•Shian Yin•Journal of Public Child Welfare•2026

  • How Does Living in Institution Impact Young Lives?’—Insights From Young People in Ci'aiyuan

    Open Access•Shian Yin•Children & Society•2025

  • Exploring leaving-care and post-care experiences

    Open Access•Shian Yin•Children and Youth Services Review•2024

  • Estimating the number of children in formal alternative care

    Open Access•Nicole Petrowski, Claudia Cappa et al.•Child Abuse & Neglect•2017

  • Triangulation in research, with examples

    Helen Noble, Roberta Heale•Evidence Based Nursing•2019

  • Writing narrative style literature reviews

    Rossella Ferrari•Medical Writing•2015

  • Systematic review or scoping review? Guidance for authors when choosing between a systematic or scoping review approach

    Open Access•Zachary Munn, Micah D J Peters et al.•BMC Medical Research Methodology•2018

  • A typology of reviews

    Open Access•Maria J Grant, Andrew Booth•Health Information & Libraries…•2009

  • Youth Leaving Institutional Care in China

    Open Access•Meirong Liu, Fei Sun et al.•Child and Adolescent Social Work…•2022

  • Young Children in Institutional Care at Risk of Harm

    Open Access•Rebecca Johnson, Rebecca J Johnson et al.•Trauma Violence & Abuse•2006

  • Investigating local policy responses to support care-experienced young people in China – A scoping review

    Open Access•Shian Yin•Children and Youth Services Review•2024

  • Family foster care and children’s outcomes in China

    Open Access•Yanfeng Xu, Xiaoou Man et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2020

  • Informal Kinship Care of Orphans in Rural China

    Open Access•Xiaoyuan Shang, Morris Saldov et al.•Social Policy and Society•2010

  • The role of extended families in childcare and protection

    Open Access•Xiaoyuan Shang•International Journal of Social…•2007

  • Looking for a Better Way to Care for Children

    Xiaoyuan Shang•Social Service Review•2002

  • Infant Abandonment and Adoption in China

    Kay Johnson, Huang Banghan et al.•Population and Development Review•1998

  • Moving towards a Multi-level and Multi-pillar System

    Open Access•Xiaoyuan Shang, Shang Xiaoyuan•Journal of Social Policy•2001

Obras citantes distintas12
Citações por ano6
Intervalo de citações2024 - 2026 (3)
Velocidade de citaçãocurrent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 12
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae