Replies to Critics

There are three prevalent themes among the critics. First, a call to advance the concept of social power by expanding on structural power and demonstrating how telic power can be operationalized. Second, the critics want a stronger objection to the collective intentionality claim (assumed by the standard model). Third, there is a need to clarify the concept of opaque kinds of social facts, especially in relation to economic class. I integrate Khalidi’s clarification of opaqueness, elaborate on the concept of economic class, and introduce a new development of the power view by operationalizing telic power through an empirical case study

Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies · Political Philosophy and Ethics

• Nepotism and sexism in peer-review

  Open Access•Christine Wennerås, Agnes Wold et al.•Nature•1997

  Incluir item

• Categories We Live By

  Ásta Kristjana Sveinsdóttir, Ásta et al.•Categories We Live By•2018

  Incluir item

• The Routledge Handbook of Collective Intentionality

  Marija Janković, Kirk Ludwig•Routledge Handbook of Collective…•2017

  Incluir item

• Resisting Reality

  María Salas Root, M Root•Analysis•2013

  Incluir item

• Ontology and Oppression

  Katharine Jenkins•Ontology and Oppression•2023

  Incluir item

• Nonideal Social Ontology

  Åsa Burman•Nonideal Social Ontology•2023

  Incluir item

• Foundations for a Social Ontology

  Amie L Thomasson, ProtoSociology Project•ProtoSociology•2003

  Incluir item

• A Framework for Social Ontology

  Open Access•Brian Epstein•Philosophy of the Social Sciences•2015

  Incluir item

• Max Weber, Collected methodological writings

  Hinnerk Bruhns•Lectures•2012

  Incluir item