Leveraging normative power in co‐production to redress power imbalances
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 6446547 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Yaru Chen (0000-0003-2368-3951, Senior Lecturer in Organisation Studies University of Liverpool Management School Liverpool UK, autor correspondente), Charlotte Croft (0000-0002-9672-7567, Professor of Organisation Studies University of Liverpool Management School Liverpool UK), Graeme Currie (0000-0002-4825-9711, Professor of Public Management, Warwick Business School The University of Warwick Coventry UK) |
| Ano | 2024 |
| Volume | 103 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Páginas | 296-312 |
| Data de publicação | 2024-07-23 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Public Administration (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0033-3298 • E-ISSN: 1467-9299 |
| Editora | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/padm.13015 |
| OpenAlex | W4400961068 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 5 |
| Referências citadas | 38 |
In this article, we explore how less dominant actors, service users in our case, utilize different types of power to influence more dominant professional groups during processes of co‐production. Drawing on semi‐structured interviews with 48 service users involved in healthcare improvement research, we illuminate the crucial role of normative power during processes of co‐production. In contrast to extant co‐production literature, which largely focuses on structural or resource power, we show how normative power is created by service users to leverage influence over more dominant actors. We highlight the relationship between structural, resource, and normative power during processes of co‐production, extending understandings of the dynamic nature of co‐production and generating implications for public involvement policy and practice
Economics · Law and economics · Microeconomics · Normative · Political science · Power (physics · Production (economics · Redress · Law · Management and Organizational Studies
The paradox of co-production
Citizens are more willing to co‐produce when participants represent community demographics
Understanding the Co‐Provision of Disaster‐Related Services in the United States
Accountability as a function of power relationships in public governance networks
Shall we tango? Exploring the drivers of co-production in US local governments
Power
The System of Professions
The Dark Side of Co-Creation and Co-Production
Three Lenses on Occupations and Professions in Organizations
Lost in the shadows
A Systematic Review of Co-Creation and Co-Production
Policy, power and the potential for counter-agency
Power and Knowledge
Too Vulnerable to Involve? Challenges of Engaging Vulnerable Groups in the Co-production of Public Services through Research
Which public and why deliberate? – A scoping review of public deliberation in public health and health policy research
Public Participation in Health and Social Care
Exploring the Relationship (and Power Dynamic) Between Researchers and Public Partners Working Together in Applied Health Research Teams
Co-production
Actor roles in co‐production—Introducing intermediaries
Power dynamics and collaborative mechanisms in co-production and co-design processes
Inside co‐production
Governance, Power, and Mandated Collaboration in an Interorganizational Network
Participation, Power, and the Role of Community Psychology in Environmental Disputes
The Power and the Promise
Publics, Patients, Citizens, Consumers? Power and Decision Making in Primary Health Care
Neutralized, enhanced, tokenistic
Nobody to shoot? Power, structure, and agency
Varieties of Participation in Public Services
Activating citizens in Dutch care reforms
Crossing the great divide
Empowering citizens or mining resources? The contested domain of citizen engagement in professional care services
A paradox in healthcare service development
Moving from rational to normative ideologies of control over public involvement
A sociological perspective on public participation in health care
The unbearable lightness of citizens within public deliberation processes
Representativeness, legitimacy and power in public involvement in health-service management
Patients as team members
Knowledge and expertise in care practices
| Obras citantes distintas | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 2,5 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 5 |