Foreign Policy Agendas and Participation in Locally Led Informal Security Coalitions
Pakistan, Sudan, and the Yemen War Coalition
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 6457925 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Rory Miller (0000-0001-5709-3277), Sarah Cardaun, Sarah K Cardaun (Helmut Schmidt University) |
| Ano | 2025 |
| Volume | 78 |
| Fascículo | 2 |
| Páginas | 153-174 |
| Data de publicação | 2025-07-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | The Middle East Journal (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0026-3141 • E-ISSN: 1940-3461 |
| Editora | The Middle East Journal (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.3751/78.23.12 |
| OpenAlex | W4411868319 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referências citadas | 9 |
Informal multinational security coalitions are established frameworks for temporary military missions. There is an extensive scholarship on the motives of partners in coalitions led by the United States, but such choices by states in locally led coalitions in the Middle East have barely been studied. This article examines the decisions of Pakistan and Sudan to participate in the coalition in Yemen led by Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, established in March 2015. The findings demonstrate that Pakistan’s and Sudan’s decisions reflected national foreign policy priorities over and above any other factors
Development economics · Economic growth · Economics · Foreign policy · Political science · Politics · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East
Prestige-seeking small states
Alliance Value and Status Enhancement
Conditional commitments
Yemen
A tale of three French interventions
Domestic politics of regional security
Explaining Third World Alignment
Bound to Follow? Leadership and Followership in the Gulf Conflict
Multinational security coalitions and the limits of middle power activism in the Middle East
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |