Associations between attentional biases for emotional images and rumination in depression

Rumination is a key feature of depression and contributes to its onset, maintenance, and recurrence. Researchers have proposed that biases in the attentional processing of emotional information may underlie rumination, and particularly, the brooding component. This investigation evaluated associations between attentional biases for emotional images and rumination, including both brooding and reflection, in currently and never depressed participants. In two separate studies, participants viewed sets of four emotional images (happy, sad, threatening, and neutral) for 8 s in a free-viewing eye-tracking paradigm. In both studies, currently depressed individuals attended to happy face images and happy naturalistic images significantly less than never depressed individuals. In Study 2, currently depressed individuals attended to sad naturalistic images significantly more than never depressed individuals. There were no statistically significant associations between attentional biases and any of the forms of rumination, independent of their shared relationship with depression symptoms. These findings call into question the robustness of the link between attentional biases and rumination

Attentional bias · Cognition · Cognitive psychology · Developmental psychology · Psychiatry · Rumination · Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes · Mental Health Research Topics · Psychology · Stress Responses and Cortisol

• Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR)

  American Psychiatric Association•Diagnostic and Statistical Manual…•2000

  Incluir item

• Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

  American Psychiatric Association American Psychiatric Association, American…•Diagnostic and Statistical Manual…•2022

  Incluir item

• Selective attention to threat in the dot probe paradigm

  Open Access•Ernst H W Koster, Geert Crombez et al.•Behaviour Research and Therapy•2004

  Incluir item

• Rumination Reconsidered

  Open Access•Wendy Treynor, Richard Gonzalez et al.•Cognitive Therapy and Research•2003

  Incluir item

• Cognition and Depression

  Ian H Gotlib, Jutta Joormann•Annual Review of Clinical…•2010

  Incluir item

• Do threatening stimuli draw or hold visual attention in subclinical anxiety?

  Elaine Fox, Riccardo Russo et al.•Journal of Experimental…•2001

  Incluir item

• A review on sex differences in processing emotional signals

  Open Access•M E Kret, Beatrice De Gelder•Neuropsychologia•2012

  Incluir item

• The NimStim set of facial expressions

  Open Access•Nim Tottenham, James W Tanaka et al.•Psychiatry Research•2009

  Incluir item

• Gender differences in depression

  Open Access•Marco Piccinelli, Greg Wilkinson•The British Journal of Psychiatry•2000

  Incluir item

• Sex and depression in the National Comorbidity Survey I

  Open Access•R C Kessler, R Keßler•Journal of Affective Disorders•1993

  Incluir item

• The Attention System of the Human Brain

  Michael I Posner, Steven E Petersen•Annual Review of Neuroscience•1990

  Incluir item

• Eye tracking of attention in the affective disorders

  Open Access•Thomas Armstrong, Bunmi O Olatunji•Clinical Psychology Review•2012

  Incluir item

• Depression

  Open Access•Joelle Lemoult, Ian H Gotlib•Clinical Psychology Review•2019

  Incluir item

• Attentional Biases for Negative Interpersonal Stimuli in Clinical Depression.

  Ian H Gotlib, Elena N Krasnoperova et al.•Journal of Abnormal Psychology•2004

  Incluir item

• Emotion regulation in depression

  Jutta Joormann, Ian H Gotlib•Cognition & Emotion•2010

  Incluir item

• Understanding depressive rumination from a cognitive science perspective

  Open Access•Ernst H W Koster, Evi De Lissnyder et al.•Clinical Psychology Review•2011

  Incluir item

• Beck Depression Inventory–II

  Aaron T Beck, R A Steer et al.•PsycTESTS Dataset•2011

  Incluir item

• G*Power 3

  Open Access•Franz Faul, Edgar Erdfelder et al.•Behavior Research Methods•2007

  Incluir item

• Validation and Utility of a Self-report Version of PRIME-MD The PHQ Primary Care Study

  Robert L Spitzer•JAMA•1999

  Incluir item

• Rethinking Rumination

  Open Access•Susan Nolen-Hoeksema, Susan Nolen–hoeksema et al.•Perspectives on Psychological…•2008

  Incluir item

• Attentional biases to emotional faces among women with a history of single episode versus recurrent major depression

  Claire E Foster, Max Owens et al.•Cognition & Emotion•2021

  Incluir item

• Effects of cognitive control training on the dynamics of (mal)adaptive emotion regulation in daily life

  Kristof Hoorelbeke, Ernst H W Koster et al.•Emotion•2016

  Incluir item

• Stuck in a sad place

  Ben Grafton, Felicity Southworth et al.•Emotion•2015

  Incluir item

• Cognitive control biases in depression

  Leanne Quigley, Thulasi Thiruchselvam et al.•Psychological Bulletin•2022

  Incluir item

• The reliability paradox

  Open Access•Craig Hedge, Georgina Powell et al.•Behavior Research Methods•2017

  Incluir item

• The Unity and Diversity of Executive Functions and Their Contributions to Complex “Frontal Lobe” Tasks

  Open Access•Akira Miyake, Naomi P Friedman et al.•Cognitive Psychology•2000

  Incluir item

• A prospective study of depression and posttraumatic stress symptoms after a natural disaster

  Susan Nolen-Hoeksema, Susan Nolen–hoeksema et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•1991

  Incluir item

• An attentional scope model of rumination

  Anson J Whitmer, Ian H Gotlib•Psychological Bulletin•2013

  Incluir item

• A power primer

  Jacob Cohen•Psychological Bulletin•1992

  Incluir item