Can Large Language Models Simulate Spoken Human Conversations
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 7150358 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Eric Mayor (0000-0001-9441-7592, Department of Psychology University of Basel, autor correspondente), Lucas M Bietti, Lucas Bietti (0000-0002-4380-2615, Department of Psychology Norwegian University of Science and Technology), Adrian Bangerter (0000-0003-3622-1860) |
| Ano | 2025 |
| Volume | 49 |
| Fascículo | 9 |
| Páginas | e70106-e70106 |
| Data de publicação | 2025-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Cognitive Science (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0364-0213 • E-ISSN: 1551-6709 |
| Editora | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/cogs.70106 |
| PMID | 40889249 |
| OpenAlex | W4413893334 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 1 |
| Referências citadas | 64 |
Large language models (LLMs) can emulate many aspects of human cognition and have been heralded as a potential paradigm shift. They are proficient in chat‐based conversation, but little is known about their ability to simulate spoken conversation. We investigated whether LLMs can simulate spoken human conversation. In Study 1, we compared transcripts of human telephone conversations from the Switchboard (SB) corpus to six corpora of transcripts generated by two powerful LLMs, GPT‐4 and Claude Sonnet 3.5, and two open‐source LLMs, Vicuna and Wayfarer, using different prompts designed to mimic SB participants’ instructions. We compared LLM and SB conversations in terms of alignment (conceptual, syntactic, and lexical), coordination markers, and coordination of openings and closings. We also documented qualitative features by which LLM conversations differ from SB conversations. In Study 2, we assessed whether humans can distinguish transcripts produced by LLMs from those of SB conversations. LLM conversations exhibited exaggerated alignment (and an increase in alignment as conversation unfolded) relative to human conversations, different and often inappropriate use of coordination markers, and were dissimilar to human conversations in openings and closings. LLM conversations did not consistently pass for SB conversations. Spoken conversations generated by LLMs are both qualitatively and quantitatively different from those of humans. This issue may evolve with better LLMs and more training on spoken conversation, but may also result from key differences between spoken conversation and chat
Conversation · Linguistics · Natural language processing · Spoken language · Communication · Computer Science · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Psychology · Speech and dialogue systems · Topic Modeling
Using Language
Variation across Speech and Writing
Discourse Markers
Saying what you mean in dialogue
Turn-taking in Human Communication – Origins and Implications for Language Processing
Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue
Switchboard
AI and the transformation of social science research
Generative Agents
Can AI language models replace human participants?
Alignment as the Basis for Successful Communication
Grounding in communication.
Multimodal Language Processing in Human Communication
The coefficient of determination R 2 and intra-class correlation coefficient from generalized linear mixed-effects models revisited and expanded
Using cognitive psychology to understand GPT-3
The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data
Performance without understanding
Transforming agency
Lexical entrainment without conceptual pacts? Revisiting the matching task
A predictive human model of language challenges traditional views in linguistics and pretrained transformer research
How to Begin
Finding "Face" in the Preference Structures of Talk-in-Interaction
Navigating Joint Projects in Telephone Conversations
Ending social encouters
Processes for Ending Social Encounters
Out of One, Many
Opening up Closings
Emergent analogical reasoning in large language models
Okay as a marker for coordinating transitions in joint actions
A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation
Alignment Is a Function of Conversational Dynamics
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 1 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 1 |