Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Can Large Language Models Simulate Spoken Human Conversations

Dados Bibliográficos

ID7150358
AutoresEric Mayor (0000-0001-9441-7592, Department of Psychology University of Basel, autor correspondente), Lucas M Bietti, Lucas Bietti (0000-0002-4380-2615, Department of Psychology Norwegian University of Science and Technology), Adrian Bangerter (0000-0003-3622-1860)
Ano2025
Volume49
Fascículo9
Páginase70106-e70106
Data de publicação2025-09-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoCognitive Science (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0364-0213 • E-ISSN: 1551-6709
EditoraWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/cogs.70106
PMID40889249
OpenAlexW4413893334
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas1
Referências citadas64

Large language models (LLMs) can emulate many aspects of human cognition and have been heralded as a potential paradigm shift. They are proficient in chat‐based conversation, but little is known about their ability to simulate spoken conversation. We investigated whether LLMs can simulate spoken human conversation. In Study 1, we compared transcripts of human telephone conversations from the Switchboard (SB) corpus to six corpora of transcripts generated by two powerful LLMs, GPT‐4 and Claude Sonnet 3.5, and two open‐source LLMs, Vicuna and Wayfarer, using different prompts designed to mimic SB participants’ instructions. We compared LLM and SB conversations in terms of alignment (conceptual, syntactic, and lexical), coordination markers, and coordination of openings and closings. We also documented qualitative features by which LLM conversations differ from SB conversations. In Study 2, we assessed whether humans can distinguish transcripts produced by LLMs from those of SB conversations. LLM conversations exhibited exaggerated alignment (and an increase in alignment as conversation unfolded) relative to human conversations, different and often inappropriate use of coordination markers, and were dissimilar to human conversations in openings and closings. LLM conversations did not consistently pass for SB conversations. Spoken conversations generated by LLMs are both qualitatively and quantitatively different from those of humans. This issue may evolve with better LLMs and more training on spoken conversation, but may also result from key differences between spoken conversation and chat

Conversation · Linguistics · Natural language processing · Spoken language · Communication · Computer Science · Natural Language Processing Techniques · Psychology · Speech and dialogue systems · Topic Modeling

  • Assessing Interactional Competence Through Generative AI

    Open Access•Inyoung•Language Testing•2026

  • Using Language

    Open Access•Herbert H Clark•Using Language•1996

  • Variation across Speech and Writing

    Open Access•Douglas Biber•Variation Across Speech and Writing•1988

  • Discourse Markers

    Open Access•Deborah Schiffrin•Discourse Markers•1987

  • Saying what you mean in dialogue

    Open Access•Simon Garrod, Anthony Anderson•Cognition•1987

  • Turn-taking in Human Communication – Origins and Implications for Language Processing

    Open Access•C Levinson, Stephen C Levinson•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2016

  • Toward a mechanistic psychology of dialogue

    Open Access•Martin J Pickering, Simon Garrod•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•2004

  • Switchboard

    J Godfrey, J J Godfrey et al.•[Proceedings] ICASSP-92: 1992…•1992

  • AI and the transformation of social science research

    Open Access•Igor Grossmann, Matthew Feinberg et al.•Science•2023

  • Generative Agents

    Open Access•Joon Sung Park, Joseph O’Brien et al.•Proceedings of the 36th Annual…•2023

  • Can AI language models replace human participants?

    Open Access•Danica Dillion, Niket Tandon et al.•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2023

  • Alignment as the Basis for Successful Communication

    Open Access•Martin J Pickering, Simon Garrod•Research on Language and…•2006

  • Grounding in communication.

    Herbert H Clark, Susan E Brennan•Perspectives on socially shared…•1991

  • Multimodal Language Processing in Human Communication

    Open Access•Judith Holler, C Levinson et al.•Trends in Cognitive Sciences•2019

  • The coefficient of determination R 2 and intra-class correlation coefficient from generalized linear mixed-effects models revisited and expanded

    Open Access•Shinichi Nakagawa, Paul C D Johnson et al.•Journal of The Royal Society…•2017

  • Using cognitive psychology to understand GPT-3

    Open Access•Marcel Binz, Emily Schulz et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2023

  • The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data

    J R Landis, Gary G Koch•Biometrics•1977

  • Performance without understanding

    Open Access•Ole Pütz, Enrico Esposito et al.•Discourse & Communication•2024

  • Transforming agency

    Open Access•Xabier E Barandiaran, Lola S Almendros•Phenomenology and the Cognitive…•2025

  • Lexical entrainment without conceptual pacts? Revisiting the matching task

    Open Access•Adrian Bangerter, Eric Mayor et al.•Journal of Memory and Language•2020

  • A predictive human model of language challenges traditional views in linguistics and pretrained transformer research

    Open Access•Sergio Torres-Martínez•Language and Semiotic Studies•2024

  • How to Begin

    Danielle Pillet-Shore•Research on Language and Social…•2018

  • Finding "Face" in the Preference Structures of Talk-in-Interaction

    Gene H Lerner•Social Psychology Quarterly•1996

  • Navigating Joint Projects in Telephone Conversations

    Adrian Bangerter, Herbert H Clark et al.•Discourse Processes•2004

  • Ending social encouters

    Open Access•Stuart Albert, Suzanne J Kessler et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•1978

  • Processes for Ending Social Encounters

    Open Access•Stuart Albert, Suzanne J Kessler et al.•Journal for the Theory of Social…•1976

  • Out of One, Many

    Open Access•Lisa P Argyle, Ethan C Busby et al.•Political Analysis•2023

  • Opening up Closings

    Open Access•Emanuel A Schegloff, Harvey Sacks•Semiotica•1973

  • Emergent analogical reasoning in large language models

    Open Access•T Webb, Keith J Holyoak et al.•Nature Human Behaviour•2023

  • Okay as a marker for coordinating transitions in joint actions

    Open Access•A Bangerter, Dominique Knutsen et al.•Journal of Pragmatics•2024

  • A Simplest Systematics for the Organization of Turn-Taking for Conversation

    Open Access•Harvey Sacks, Emanuel A Schegloff et al.•Language•2025

  • Alignment Is a Function of Conversational Dynamics

    Open Access•Monica A Riordan, Roger J Kreuz et al.•Journal of Language and Social…•2014

Obras citantes distintas1
Citações por ano1
Intervalo de citações2026 - 2026 (1)
Velocidade de citaçãocurrent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 1
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae