Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Instructed Response Item Attention Checks in Mixed-mode Questionnaires

Evidence from a Probability-based Mail and Online Panel

Dados Bibliográficos

ID7154407
AutoresJessica Daikeler (0000-0002-4879-8344, GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences, autor correspondente), Joss Roßmann (0000-0003-2701-0690, GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences), David Bretschi (UnDeSkRiMiNaLa), Tobias Gummer (0000-0001-6469-7802, University of Mannheim), H Silber (0000-0002-3568-3257, University of Mannheim)
Ano2025
Volume37
Fascículo3
Páginas228-243
Data de publicação2025-08-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoCAM (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 1087-8513 • E-ISSN: 1552-3969
EditoraSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/1525822x241274103
OpenAlexW4404020153
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas1
Referências citadas24

Mostly in web surveys, attention checks have been proposed to identify inattentive respondents in self-administered surveys as previous research has argued that low-quality answers may introduce severe biases in data analyses. The increasing popularity of mixing survey modes for conducting probability-based surveys amplifies the need for systematic research on the implementation of attention checks in these survey designs. Our study investigates whether an instructed response item (IRI) can be an adequate predictor of response quality in a self-administered mixed-mode panel survey with a probability-based German general population sample. By doing so, we compare the results of the attention check with those of other response quality indicators. However, while the results for the online respondents were somewhat promising, the mail respondents result suggests that this response quality indicator seems unreliable, so that we cannot recommend using IRIs in general population mixed-mode surveys, which include a mail option

Human–computer interaction · Mode (computer interface · Statistics · Applied Psychology · Behavioral Health and Interventions · Computer Science · Mathematics · Psychology · Psychometric Methodologies and Testing · Social Psychology · Survey Methodology and Nonresponse

  • Do Respondents’ Commitments Improve Data Quality in Opt-in Online Surveys? An International Experiment on Participants’ Attentiveness, Cheating, Satisficing, and Skipping

    Open Access•Farsan Ghassim•Sociological Methods & Research•2026

  • A Review of Conceptual Approaches and Empirical Evidence on Probability and Nonprobability Sample Survey Research

    Open Access•Carina Cornesse, Annelies G Blom et al.•Journal of Survey Statistics and…•2020

  • Improving propensity score weighting using machine learning

    Open Access•Brian K Lee, Justin Lessler et al.•Statistics in Medicine•2010

  • Methodology of Longitudinal Surveys

    Open Access•P Sturgis, N Allum et al.•Methodology of Longitudinal Surveys•2009

  • Web Survey Methodology

    Mario Callegaro, Katja Lozar Manfreda et al.•Web Survey Methodology (Research…•2015

  • Response strategies for coping with the cognitive demands of attitude measures in surveys

    Open Access•Jon A Krosnick•Applied Cognitive Psychology•1991

  • Web Versus Other Survey Modes

    Open Access•Jessica Daikeler, Michael Bosnjak et al.•Journal of Survey Statistics and…•2019

  • Short and Long Instructional Manipulation Checks

    Open Access•Meike Morren, Leonard J Paas•International Journal of Public…•2019

  • Establishing an Open Probability-Based Mixed-Mode Panel of the General Population in Germany

    Open Access•Michael Bosnjak, Tanja Dannwolf et al.•Social Science Computer Review•2017

  • Why Do Web Surveys Take Longer on Smartphones

    Open Access•Mick P Couper, Gregg Peterson et al.•Social Science Computer Review•2016

  • Using Instructed Response Items as Attention Checks in Web Surveys

    Open Access•Tobias Gummer, Joss Roßmann et al.•Sociological Methods & Research•2021

  • Methods for the detection of carelessly invalid responses in survey data

    Open Access•Paul Curran, Paul G Curran•Journal of Experimental Social…•2015

  • Instructional manipulation checks

    Open Access•Daniel M Oppenheimer, Tom Meyvis et al.•Journal of Experimental Social…•2009

  • The European Values Study 2017

    Open Access•Ruud Luijkx, Guðbjörg Andrea Jónsdóttir et al.•European Sociological Review•2021

  • The Issue of Noncompliance in Attention Check Questions

    Open Access•H Silber, Joss Roßmann et al.•CAM•2022

  • Web Surveys

    Mick P Couper•Public Opinion Quarterly•2000

  • It's a Trap! Instructional Manipulation Checks Prompt Systematic Thinking on "Tricky" Tasks

    Open Access•David J Hauser, David Hauser et al.•SAGE Open•2015

  • Disentangling mode-specific selection and measurement bias in social surveys

    Barry Schouten, Jan Van Den Brakel et al.•Social Science Research•2013

Obras citantes distintas1
Citações por ano1
Intervalo de citações2026 - 2026 (1)
Velocidade de citaçãocurrent
Altamente citadoNão
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae