Between Rescue and Research
An Evaluation after 30 Years of Liberal Metal Detecting in Archaeological Research and Heritage Practice in Denmark
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 7175145 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Andres S Dobat (0000-0002-4452-6907, Aarhus University, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2013 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Fascículo | 4 |
| Páginas | 704-725 |
| Data de publicação | 2013-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | European Journal of Archaeology (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 1461-9571 • E-ISSN: 1741-2722 |
| Editora | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1179/1461957113y.0000000041 |
| OpenAlex | W2091570056 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 33 |
| Referências citadas | 6 |
Since the early 1980s, metal detector surveying conducted by amateur archaeologists has contributed significantly to archaeological research and heritage practice in Denmark. Here, metal detecting has always been legal, and official stakeholders pursue a liberal model, focusing on cooperation and inclusion rather than confrontation and criminalization. Like no other surveying method since the invention of the shovel, the metal detector has contributed to increasing enormously the amount of data and sites from metal-rich periods. Virtually all of the spectacular and ground-breaking discoveries of the past decades are owed to metal detectors in the hands of amateur archaeologists. And it is these finds and sites that today constitute one of the very foci of archaeological research. This article provides an overview of the current status of liberal metal detector archaeology in Denmark 30 years after its inception, and attempts to identify the reasons why this popular hobby never developed into the problem it has become in other parts of the world. It concludes that the success of the liberal model in Denmark is the result of a very complex interplay of legislative, historical, cultural, and social factors. On this basis, it is discussed whether the Danish experience can be used as a source of inspiration in the necessary progression towards a new legal agenda for responsible metal detector archaeology
Archaeology · Archaeology and ancient environmental studies · Historical and Archaeological Studies · History · Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction
Hunter of the past
The Dime project
Polish and Danish regulations on the search for portable antiquities ‒ remarks upon the recent amendment of the law in Poland
Hobby Metal-detecting as Citizen Science. Background, Challenges and Opportunities of Collaborative Archeological Finds Recording Schemes
Professional–Collector Collaboration
Boundary Making in Translation Zones
Metal-Detecting Rallies
Collaboration and Communication between Hobby Metal Detectorists and Archaeologists in Norway
Rational Grounds for Dialogue Between Archaeologists and Metal Detectorists in Spain
Between Two Places
The Complexities of Metal Detecting Policy and Practice
Private Metal Detecting and Archaeology in Norway
Medea
Professional Amateurs”. Metal Detecting and Metal Detectorists in Denmark
Sæheimr
Quidditching’ and the Emergence of New Heritage Identities — Amateur Metal Detecting in Finland
Towards a Cooperative Approach to Hobby Metal Detecting
Perspectives on and from the Danish metal-detecting community
Unearthing Perspectives
Metal Detecting in University Education
Metal detecting and archaeology in the Nordic region. Introduction
Detecting Empowerment, Sustaining Commitment
Crossing the Maelstrom
Cultures Without Borders
Lány – ein Produktionsort gegossenener Bronzen der Spätawarenzeit in der awarisch-slawischen Kontaktzone des unteren Thayatals
Nazi memorabilia, dark heritage and treasure hunting as “alternative” tourism
Late Viking-Age Dragon-Slayers — Two Unusual Urnes-Style Brooches from Sjælland, Denmark
Metal detecting as a social formation
Digital archaeological knowledge production and communication among metal detectorists
Securing Cultural Heritage Objects and Fencing Stolen Goods? A Case Study on Museums and Metal Detecting in Norway
In Defence of Small Things Forgotten
Collaborate, Condemn, or Ignore? Responding to Non-Archaeological Approaches to Archaeological Heritage
Organically Grown Archaeological Databases and their ‘Messiness
| Obras citantes distintas | 33 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 2,75 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2014 - 2025 (12) |
| Velocidade de citação | recent |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 31 |