Scientists in a Changed Institutional Environment

How do scientists react when the institutional setting in which they conduct their work changes radically? How do long-standing norms regarding the social responsibility of scientists fare? What factors influence whether scientists embrace or reject the new institutions and norms? We examine these questions using data from a unique survey of 602 scientists in Russia, whose research institutions experienced a sustained crisis and sweeping changes following the collapse of the Soviet Union. We develop measures of how respondents view financing based on grants and other institutional changes in the Russian science system, as well as measures of two norms regarding scientists' social responsibility. We find that the majority of scientists have adapted, in the sense that they hold positive views of the new institutions, but a diversity of orientations remains. Social responsibility norms are common but far from universal among Russian scientists. The main correlates of adaptation are age and current success at negotiating the new institutions, though prospective success, work context, and ethnicity have some of the hypothesized associations. As for social responsibility norms, the main source of variation is age: younger scientists are more likely to embrace individualistic rather than socially oriented norms

Collective responsibility · Context (archaeology · Diversity (politics · Individualism · Negotiation · Political science · Public relations · Social responsibility · Sociology · Contemporary Sociological Theory and Practice · Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies · Health disparities and outcomes · Law · Psychology · Social Psychology

• The interplay of the material and the discursive in Russian academic prose (1980–2010)

  Natalia Kovalyova•Russian Journal of Communication•2014

  Incluir item

• Innovation by coercion

  Open Access•Olga V Bychkova, Olga Bychkova•Social Studies of Science•2016

  Incluir item

• Empire of Knowledge

  Alexander Vucinich•Empire of Knowledge•1984

  Incluir item

• Science in shock

  Peter Kneen•Europe Asia Studies•1995

  Incluir item

• Transformation of the Research System in a Transitional Society

  Open Access•Nadezhda Gaponenko•Social Studies of Science•1995

  Incluir item

• Basic Research in the East and West

  Open Access•J M Irvine, John Irvine et al.•Social Studies of Science•1985

  Incluir item

• Bioweapons Proliferation

  Open Access•Kathleen M Vogel, Kathleen Vogel•Social Studies of Science•2006

  Incluir item

• Russian Academic Science Today

  Open Access•Elena Z Mirskaya•Social Studies of Science•1995

  Incluir item

• Preventing Nuclear Entrepreneurship in Russia's Nuclear Cities

  Sharon K Weiner•International Security•2002

  Incluir item

• The Soviet defence industry

  Open Access•Christopher Smart•Orbis•1993

  Incluir item

• Russian Scientific Institutions

  Open Access•Paul Josephson, Paul R Josephson•Minerva•1994

  Incluir item

• Russian Scientists and Rogue States

  Deborah Yarsike Ball, T P Gerber•International Security•2005

  Incluir item

• The State of Russian Science

  T P Gerber, Deborah Yarsike Ball•Post-Soviet Affairs•2002

  Incluir item

• Between Markets and the State

  Etel Solingen•Comparative Politics•1993

  Incluir item

• Institutions

  Open Access•Douglass C North•The Journal of Economic…•1991

  Incluir item